<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>archsetup/docs/specs/2026-07-12-component-generation-spec.org, branch claude/hungry-franklin-09fffc</title>
<subtitle>Builds a full dev workstation from a bare Arch Linux install.
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.cjennings.net/archsetup/atom?h=claude%2Fhungry-franklin-09fffc</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.cjennings.net/archsetup/atom?h=claude%2Fhungry-franklin-09fffc'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/archsetup/'/>
<updated>2026-07-18T15:50:18+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>refactor(gallery): rename GW namespace to DUPRE, kit to The Dupre Kit</title>
<updated>2026-07-18T15:50:18+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Craig Jennings</name>
<email>c@cjennings.net</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-18T15:50:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/archsetup/commit/?id=5fb6b9836ac8389bb68ce27e70331b3e2d29aa04'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5fb6b9836ac8389bb68ce27e70331b3e2d29aa04</id>
<content type='text'>
The gallery and its library are now The Dupre Kit, named for the dupre color theme. GW was too opaque to remember. The stylesheet id is now dupre-css, the card handle property is .dupre, and page prose says instrument instead of widget. File names stay put. Renaming them is a separate decision.

Historical log entries in todo.org keep their GW references as a record.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs(spec): record Phase 1 completion in the component-generation spec</title>
<updated>2026-07-13T04:05:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Craig Jennings</name>
<email>c@cjennings.net</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-13T04:05:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/archsetup/commit/?id=5d2008cb5743a95b58952fcc20c3a5f9e393ff73'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5d2008cb5743a95b58952fcc20c3a5f9e393ff73</id>
<content type='text'>
Dated history line for the finished extraction, the extraction acceptance criterion checked, the appendix's demand-matrix label corrected from Phase 1 to Phase 2 (a leftover from the pre-review phase order), and the consumer design notes that widget CSS ships inside widgets.js via GW_CSS.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs(spec): component-generation spec reviewed, folded, and decomposed</title>
<updated>2026-07-13T02:03:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Craig Jennings</name>
<email>c@cjennings.net</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-13T02:03:02+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/archsetup/commit/?id=e9914143e23a884f666739a9f616a1fde1115199'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e9914143e23a884f666739a9f616a1fde1115199</id>
<content type='text'>
spec-review passed with three findings, all pre-agreed and folded in the same pass: the option-1 approval superseded the demand-gated extraction order (extraction now covers the full catalogue ungated, phases 1-2 swapped, decisions 4 and 8 re-scoped), the card-record refactor is now named in phase 1, and stale counts were refreshed (109 cards, R56). Lifecycle DRAFT -&gt; READY -&gt; DOING; phase tasks live under the Retro widget catalogue parent with the spec UUID stamped as :SPEC_ID:.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs(specs): close the web-library packaging decision</title>
<updated>2026-07-13T01:25:21+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Craig Jennings</name>
<email>c@cjennings.net</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-13T01:25:21+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/archsetup/commit/?id=b55746fffaf114ae7929e4592c0d26778fc794d0'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b55746fffaf114ae7929e4592c0d26778fc794d0</id>
<content type='text'>
Craig approved the classic-script widgets.js with a GW namespace as part of the componentization go-ahead. All eight decisions resolved; the spec is ready for review. The build itself waits on his per-card validation pass.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs(specs): add the widget component-generation spec (DRAFT)</title>
<updated>2026-07-12T15:17:28+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Craig Jennings</name>
<email>c@cjennings.net</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-12T15:17:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/archsetup/commit/?id=490a6da8f59d0aab74f763e3a5554f3de05bec24'/>
<id>urn:sha1:490a6da8f59d0aab74f763e3a5554f3de05bec24</id>
<content type='text'>
The collection phase closed at 84 verified cards, so porting needs a decision procedure before consumer work starts. The spec carries the agreed five phases (demand inventory, web library extraction, Emacs ports, waybar audio pilot, Level-2 generator go/no-go) and records the baked architecture decisions. I left the web library's packaging shape as the one open decision, tracked as a VERIFY in todo.org. The gallery is the prototype evidence, with the R-series history as the iteration record.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
