<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>dotemacs/docs/2026-05-25-emacs-terminal-comparison.org, branch main</title>
<subtitle>My Emacs configuration
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.cjennings.net/dotemacs/atom?h=main</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.cjennings.net/dotemacs/atom?h=main'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/dotemacs/'/>
<updated>2026-05-26T20:32:33+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>docs: add vterm/eat/ghostel terminal comparison</title>
<updated>2026-05-26T20:32:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Craig Jennings</name>
<email>c@cjennings.net</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-26T20:32:33+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/dotemacs/commit/?id=26fcf9e228765d2ed4cb09007d6958a201e24f56'/>
<id>urn:sha1:26fcf9e228765d2ed4cb09007d6958a201e24f56</id>
<content type='text'>
Research notes weighing the three Emacs terminal backends (vterm, eat, ghostel) on maintenance risk, rendering fidelity, and best-fit role. Referenced by the "Consolidate to EAT" task as the basis for that evaluation.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
