<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>dotemacs/docs/subr-mock-migration-spec.org, branch main</title>
<subtitle>My Emacs configuration
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.cjennings.net/dotemacs/atom?h=main</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.cjennings.net/dotemacs/atom?h=main'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/dotemacs/'/>
<updated>2026-06-30T12:11:14+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>docs: spec for migrating tests off mocking primitives</title>
<updated>2026-06-30T12:11:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Craig Jennings</name>
<email>c@cjennings.net</email>
</author>
<published>2026-06-30T12:11:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.cjennings.net/dotemacs/commit/?id=da5bff1deb1ee8428fe5f14f8c795cf1559f104a'/>
<id>urn:sha1:da5bff1deb1ee8428fe5f14f8c795cf1559f104a</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull the long-term subr-mock migration out of the task list into a discussion spec: the native-comp origin, the stopgap already shipped (variadic sweep plus the arity meta-test), the real scope (the UI-prompt mocks, not the boundary mocks the test rules say to keep), and the open decisions to settle before any code moves.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
