aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/design/theme-selector-package-faces-spec.org
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* docs(theme-selector): incorporate Codex review into the package-faces specCraig Jennings2026-06-071-0/+511
I ran spec-response against Codex's review. Added implementation phases, acceptance criteria, the package-face inventory source, and state/export semantics with a source field that distinguishes seeded defaults from user edits from deliberate clears. The inventory is hybrid and split: the generated all-package path is its own phase after org, magit, and elfeed, so the three bespoke apps don't wait on it and the scope-explosion risk Codex flagged stays contained. Two findings I modified with reasons in the dispositions section, the rest accepted. Renamed the spec to -spec.org for the workflow precondition. The rubric is now Ready with caveats, and three decisions stay open for me: the inheritance representation, hybrid-vs-curated-only inventory, and the custom picker timing.