| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | test: cover org-drill-presentation-prompt-in-buffer | Craig Jennings | 2026-05-05 | 1 | -0/+61 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | I extended the presentation-prompt tests with cases for the in-buffer variant: default prompt assembled when none is supplied, explicit prompt fed straight through, drill-answer cleared on entry, and the session's exit-kind flowing back to the caller after recursive-edit returns. Recursive-edit, display-buffer, and the timer are all mocked. Coverage moved from 93.2% to 94.4%. | ||||
| * | test: presentation-prompt return values and dispatcher | Craig Jennings | 2026-05-05 | 1 | -0/+125 |
| 7 ERT tests covering the card-prompt return-value contract: - org-drill-presentation-prompt-in-mini-buffer with input-pending-p and read-key-sequence both mocked: quit → nil, edit → 'edit, skip → 'skip, any-other-key → t - explicit PROMPT arg appears in the formatted full-prompt - org-drill-presentation-prompt dispatcher routes by org-drill-presentation-prompt-with-typing (nil → mini-buffer variant, non-nil → in-buffer variant) | |||||
