Claude Code skills, rules, and language bundles https://git.cjennings.net/rulesets/atom?h=main 2026-06-12T07:47:22+00:00 2026-06-12T07:47:22+00:00 Craig Jennings c@cjennings.net 2026-06-12T07:47:22+00:00 urn:sha1:006711142e4a23da4fc990dc1371807d6200a74e The re-review confirmed every disposition with no new high or medium findings: Phase 1.5 stands at Ready with caveats, phases 2-5 stay parked behind the decisions fence. The response is correspondingly small — the accepted editorial rename of the Emacs subsection (its "open issue / blocks readiness" heading outlived the body, which is now an integration contract) and the second-pass note in the dispositions section. The updated review file and its history and task-tracking edits ride along. 2026-06-12T07:24:01+00:00 Craig Jennings c@cjennings.net 2026-06-12T07:24:01+00:00 urn:sha1:22e19c21e6aabe0319d4b09a862f4a3705c92509 The review's top finding was that one Not-ready label hid an implementable slice. Status now splits by arc: Phase 1.5 helper instances are READY WITH CAVEATS (the three-ring gate and the manual drills are binding, and the ai-term.el work is a coordinated .emacs.d handoff with an exact artifact), while phases 2-5 stay NOT READY behind a decisions-required section and a Phase 5 reverification prerequisite that demotes the model table to a recommendation. The remaining findings hardened the slice: per-ring rollback actions including the half-propagated-sync case, the review's test inventory adopted as normative, a message contract for stale helper files, and explicit roster-unavailable behavior on unsupported platforms. All recommendations accepted except the document split, modified to a dual rubric in one document. The review file and dispositions table ride along.