| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Two changes land together because each is broken without the other.
open-tasks.org gains a new Phase A.1, evaluated only in Next Mode. The
phase reads :LAST_AUDIT: from notes.org and walks five state signals
(reminder/task mismatch, passed scheduled date, "waiting on X" matches a
shipped X, dead file: link, sub-task >75% DONE coverage). If the temporal
threshold of 14 days trips, or any signal fires, Next Mode offers a
task-audit run before producing the recommendation. Item 1 in the offer
is "run task-audit first" per the recommendation-at-item-1 convention.
task-audit.org gains two pieces. Phase C now enforces priority and
type-tag presence per the project's legend, applies the [#A] dating rule
from that legend, and re-assesses :quick: and :solo: from reconciled
facts. Unambiguous calls land autonomously. Ambiguous ones flag
NEEDS-USER instead of being guessed. A new Phase E stamps :LAST_AUDIT:
on completion.
|
| |
|
|
| |
The .ai/ mirror lagged claude-templates/.ai/ for three workflows (task-audit, task-review, triage-intake) and two scripts (screenshot.py and its test) — earlier commits updated the canonical copies without resyncing the mirror in the same commit. The startup rsync caught it up; this commit tracks the result so the two stay identical.
|
|
|
A task audit reconciles each open task's recorded content against reality (sessions, email, chat, ticketing, calendar, recordings) and fixes the stale facts. That's distinct from task-review, which grooms relevance and priority. The two compose: review keeps the list lean, and audit keeps the survivors factually honest. Registered it in the workflow INDEX with its trigger phrases.
|
