aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/claude-rules/testing.md
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* refactor(rules): split testing.md, fix the approval gate, require first personCraig Jennings12 hours1-364/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Three changes to the same layer. I split testing.md the way I split commits.md, by what has to be resident rather than by size. What stays is the standing directive: TDD is the default, write the failing test first, and every unit needs Normal, Boundary, and Error cases. That has to fire before any code is written, which is exactly when no skill has been summoned, so it can't ride a trigger. Everything else moved to the testing-standards skill: characterization recipes, the per-category detail, property-based and mutation testing, the pyramid, integration rules, naming, the test-quality and mocking rules, coverage targets, the spike exception, and the anti-patterns. 2,824 words down to 347. I fixed the approval gate in the publish flow. It decided whether to ask for approval by checking whether .ai/ is tracked, using that as a proxy for "team repo." The proxy was wrong in the direction that matters: rulesets, home, and work all track .ai/ while all three are private single-user repos, so the rule skipped the gate on the three projects I use most. It now checks whether any remote is on a host other than cjennings.net, which is the thing that actually decides whether someone else reads the log. Every current project resolves to gate-applies, which matches how the flow has actually been run. I also added a first-person directive to the always-loaded core. One already existed for commit bodies and PR prose, but it moved into the publish skill with everything else, and it never covered code comments at all. Now everything I author in or about the repo is first person, with one carve-out: a comment describing what the code does stays third person, because there the code is the actor and not me. Separately I split the publish skill internally. PR descriptions and the three review shapes moved to references/pull-requests.md, since a plain commit never needs them. Always-loaded rules are now about 28,900 tokens, down from 57,800 this morning. One risk on the record. testing.md's margin is thinner than commits.md's was. If testing-standards fails to trigger while I'm writing tests I lose the mocking-boundary rules, which is a quality regression rather than a permanent one, but it is a real bet where commits.md's was not. I also moved the TDD rationalization table rather than cutting it. The posts argue that kind of over-argument is counterproductive now, but removing your defense against me skipping TDD is your call, not mine.
* docs(testing): sharpen characterization-test guidance, wire it into the ↵Craig Jennings8 days1-0/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | quality sweep The rule already said "write a characterization test before refactoring" but not what one is or how many to write per unit. Two additions close that. testing.md's "Adding Tests to Existing Untested Code" now defines a characterization test as recording what the code actually does, not what it should (Feathers' assert-wrong-read-the-real-value recipe), and requires the same Normal/Boundary/Error set as any unit rather than one happy-path capture. The reason is the useful part: on a characterization test the negative and boundary cases are the bug-finders, because untested legacy code is weakest at the empty input and the missing upstream, and pinning what it currently does there writes the wrong behavior down where it becomes a visible bug. A pinned case that turns out to be a bug graduates from recording current behavior to asserting correct behavior. In-unit bugs fall to this set. Composition bugs need a functional test. The refactor-for-testability section gains the framing that when the untestable code is legacy you're hardening, extracting the pure core is the hardening, not a detour around it. A function you can't characterize without mocking tmux or git can't be refactored safely, so "needs too much mocking" is the signal to reshape it, never a license to skip the boundary and error cases. code-quality.org's passes claim to preserve behavior, so it now states the precondition that makes that true: on untested scope, a characterization net comes first, or "behavior-preserving" is an assertion the green suite can't actually verify.
* docs(rules): add escalation testing and a spike protocol to testing.mdCraig Jennings2026-05-221-1/+61
| | | | Two additions. An "Escalation Beyond Category and Pairwise" section adds property-based testing (for invariants across a broad input domain) and mutation testing (for when high coverage hides thin assertions), both as escalation paths rather than always-on gates. And the "I need to spike first" excuse is formalized into a disciplined spike protocol: TDD stays the default, but a spike is sanctioned only when timeboxed, not committed, and followed by the first failing test before productionizing.
* docs(testing): rewrite time-mocking helper rule to be language-agnosticCraig Jennings2026-04-251-7/+15
| | | | | | | | The original phrasing leaned on Lisp terms (let-bind, defvar) that don't translate to most other languages. Generalize to two named failure modes (infinite recursion against the mocked primitive, scope-shadowing that production callers can't see) with examples across Python, Lisp, Go, and JavaScript so the rule applies regardless of stack.
* docs(commits,testing): add merge strategy + multi-pass gate + time-mocking ↵Craig Jennings2026-04-251-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | safety commits.md gets two additions. A new "## Merge Strategy" section makes squash-merge the default for feature branches and requires explicit confirmation of the merge approach before pushing or merging. A new "Multi-pass gate" paragraph in Review and Publish requires every humanizer-flow pass to run and be named when declaring done, so silent skips become defects. testing.md gets a new bullet under "### Determinism": time/clock-mocking helpers must not recurse against the primitive they're mocking, and must not let-bind over a defvar — the binding shadows only inside the test scope, so production code reading the symbol still gets the original value (silent test miss).
* docs: split Linear vs PR structure; propagate content-scope rule to Tier 1 ↵Craig Jennings2026-04-241-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | skills Linear ticket bodies are now Problem + Fix only. PR descriptions keep the four-section format (Problem, Fix, Why this fixes it, How it was tested). Linear's GitHub integration handles the cross-link via the PR body's Linear: line. Cross-ref to the content-scope rule appended at the end of each Tier 1 skill that produces public artifacts: testing.md, arch-document, arch-decide, arch-design, review-code, respond-to-review, brainstorm, codify. Single-source the rule in commits.md, point at it from each output-producing skill.
* feat: adopt pairwise-tests (PICT combinatorial) + cross-reference from ↵Craig Jennings2026-04-191-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | existing testing skills Forked verbatim from omkamal/pypict-claude-skill (MIT). LICENSE preserved. Renamed from `pict-test-designer` to `pairwise-tests` — technique-first naming so users invoking "pairwise" or "combinatorial" find it; PICT remains the tool under the hood. Bundle (skill-runtime only): pairwise-tests/SKILL.md (renamed, description rewritten) pairwise-tests/LICENSE (MIT, preserved) pairwise-tests/references/pict_syntax.md pairwise-tests/references/examples.md pairwise-tests/scripts/pict_helper.py (Python CLI for model gen / output fmt) pairwise-tests/scripts/README.md Upstream's repo-level docs (README, QUICKSTART, CONTRIBUTING, etc.) and `examples/` dir (ATM + gearbox walkthroughs — useful as reading, not as skill-runtime) omitted from the fork. Attribution footer added. Cross-references so /add-tests naturally routes to /pairwise-tests when warranted: - add-tests/SKILL.md Phase 2 step 8: if a function in scope has 3+ parameters each taking multiple values, surface `/pairwise-tests` to the user before proposing normal category coverage. Default continues with /add-tests; user picks pairwise explicitly. - claude-rules/testing.md: new "Combinatorial Coverage" section after the Normal/Boundary/Error categories. Explains when pairwise wins, when to skip (regulated / provably exhaustive contexts, ≤2 parameters, non- parametric testing), and points at /pairwise-tests. - languages/python/claude/rules/python-testing.md: new "Pairwise / Combinatorial for Parameter-Heavy Functions" subsection under the parametrize guidance. Explains the pytest workflow: /pairwise-tests generates the matrix, paste into pytest parametrize block, or use pypict helper directly. Mechanism note: cross-references are judgment-based — Claude reads the nudges in add-tests/testing/python-testing and acts on them when appropriate, not automatic dispatch. Craig can still invoke /pairwise-tests directly when he already knows he wants combinatorial coverage. Makefile SKILLS extended; make install symlinks /pairwise-tests globally.
* feat(rules): port key testing principles from quality-engineer promptCraig Jennings2026-04-191-0/+104
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additions to claude-rules/testing.md: - Testing pyramid proportions (70-80% unit / 15-25% integration / 5-10% e2e) - Integration Tests section: docstring must name 'Components integrated:' and mark real vs mocked; when-to-write heuristics - Signs of Overmocking: 'would the test pass if the function body was NotImplementedError?' plus three more sharp questions - Testing Code That Uses Frameworks: test your integration, not the framework itself - Test Real Code, Not Copies: never inline prod code into tests - Error Behavior, Not Error Text: test type + key values, not exact prose - If Tests Are Hard to Write, Refactor the Code: hard-to-test is a code signal, not a test signal; extract focused helpers - Anti-patterns list extended Addition to languages/elisp/claude/rules/elisp-testing.md: - Interactive vs Internal split pattern: cj/foo wraps cj/--foo; test the internal directly, skip UI mocks Source: ~/.emacs.d/ai-prompts/quality-engineer.org (personal reference, kept as an extended prompt separate from these rules).
* refactor: generalize testing.md, split Python specifics, DRY installCraig Jennings2026-04-191-4/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | claude-rules/testing.md is now language-agnostic (TDD principles, test categories, coverage targets, anti-patterns). Scope header widened to **/*. Python-specific content (pytest, fixtures, parametrize, anyio, Django DB testing) moved to languages/python/claude/rules/python-testing.md. Added languages/python/ bundle (rules only so far; no CLAUDE.md template or hooks yet — Python validation tooling differs from Elisp). Added install-python shortcut to the Makefile. Updated scripts/install-lang.sh to copy claude-rules/*.md into each target project's .claude/rules/. Bundles no longer need to carry their own verification.md copy — deleted languages/elisp/claude/rules/verification.md. Single source of truth in claude-rules/, fans out via install. Elisp-testing.md now references testing.md as its base (matches the python-testing.md pattern).
* Add general-purpose skills and rules from DeepSat coding-rulesetsCraig Jennings2026-03-291-0/+140
Skills (adapted from DeepSat, stripped of project-specific references): - /review-pr: PR review against engineering standards - /fix-issue: issue-to-merge TDD workflow - /security-check: secrets, OWASP, and dependency audit - /debug: systematic 4-phase debugging - /add-tests: test coverage analysis and generation - /respond-to-review: evaluate and implement code review feedback Rules (general-purpose, copied as-is): - testing.md: universal TDD standards and anti-patterns - verification.md: proof over assumption Makefile updated to install both skills and rules via symlinks. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>