aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/claude-templates/.ai/workflows/task-audit.org
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* feat(workflows): audit-warranted pre-step + priority and tag enforcementCraig Jennings2026-05-281-1/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Two changes land together because each is broken without the other. open-tasks.org gains a new Phase A.1, evaluated only in Next Mode. The phase reads :LAST_AUDIT: from notes.org and walks five state signals (reminder/task mismatch, passed scheduled date, "waiting on X" matches a shipped X, dead file: link, sub-task >75% DONE coverage). If the temporal threshold of 14 days trips, or any signal fires, Next Mode offers a task-audit run before producing the recommendation. Item 1 in the offer is "run task-audit first" per the recommendation-at-item-1 convention. task-audit.org gains two pieces. Phase C now enforces priority and type-tag presence per the project's legend, applies the [#A] dating rule from that legend, and re-assesses :quick: and :solo: from reconciled facts. Unambiguous calls land autonomously. Ambiguous ones flag NEEDS-USER instead of being guessed. A new Phase E stamps :LAST_AUDIT: on completion.
* docs: add :solo: tag handling to the task workflowsCraig Jennings2026-05-231-0/+1
| | | | | | The task-review and task-audit workflows already assess :quick:, an effort estimate. I added :solo: alongside it: a task Claude can finish end-to-end without Craig's input, gated on bounded scope, no design or preference call, and local verifiability. In task-review.org I added a tagging subsection paralleling :quick:, a mention in the close-out summary, and a common-mistake entry against over-tagging. task-audit.org now re-assesses both tags during content reconciliation, since a resolved dependency can make a stuck task newly solo-able. It points at task-review.org for the definitions rather than restating them.
* feat(workflows): add task-audit content-reconciliation workflowCraig Jennings2026-05-221-0/+97
A task audit reconciles each open task's recorded content against reality (sessions, email, chat, ticketing, calendar, recordings) and fixes the stale facts. That's distinct from task-review, which grooms relevance and priority. The two compose: review keeps the list lean, and audit keeps the survivors factually honest. Registered it in the workflow INDEX with its trigger phrases.