rulesets - Claude Code skills, rules, and language bundles

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	docs: revise and ratify the no-approvals speedrun spec	Craig Jennings	11 days	1	-83/+138
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Recast the speedrun eligibility criteria as checkable gates, not adjectives: dropped the task-size gate so large tasks decompose into per-commit chunks, replaced the act-vs-file rule with a four-item defer checklist keyed on whether the failing test is writable from the task text, and added a pre-flight step that front-loads a run's decisions so it proceeds unattended after. Define :solo: and :quick: precisely enough to enforce in task-review and task-audit. Also record the spec storage and lifecycle-status decision (org-keyword authoritative, drop the filename suffix) and the requirement to retrofit existing docs across projects.
*	docs: spec autonomous-batch execution and KB contribution	Craig Jennings	2026-06-16	1	-0/+329
	The parked Phase E proposal and the "fix speedrun" mode describe the same capability, so I reconciled them into one autonomous-batch spec: a dedicated work-the-backlog.org holds the execution loop, inbox-zero keeps its routing, and "fix speedrun" is a thin preset over it. The spec also designs an effectiveness-measurement trial (a per-task metrics log plus periodic org-roam synthesis articles). The second spec wires light KB-contribution prompts into four workflows plus a curated best-practices node. Both tasks now carry a review VERIFY. The wrap-up-routing implementation stays open: it moves tasks between projects' todo.org files, so it needs a focused session with a data-loss checkpoint, not a tail-end rush.