rulesets - Claude Code skills, rules, and language bundles

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	feat(kb): wire consult + contribute KB prompts into the workflows	Craig Jennings	2026-06-20	1	-9/+20
\| \| \| \|	Recent session receipts read "promoted 0 / consulted no" across the board: the wrap-up KB-promotion check existed but fired too late, and nothing surfaced existing lessons to read. This adds the spec's four light prompts plus the read-side step it was missing. Startup gets two Phase C nudges (gated on the roam clone): a consult line listing project-relevant node titles, and a contribute line pointing at the best-practices node. Triage-intake and inbox-zero get a conditional end-of-flow capture reminder that fires only on real signal. Wrap-up gets an early reflection prompt at the top of Step 1 that feeds the existing receipt, so learnings are captured while fresh instead of reconstructed after the Summary. Ratifies the spec's five decisions and adds D6 (the read-side surfacing).
*	docs: spec autonomous-batch execution and KB contribution	Craig Jennings	2026-06-16	1	-0/+188
	The parked Phase E proposal and the "fix speedrun" mode describe the same capability, so I reconciled them into one autonomous-batch spec: a dedicated work-the-backlog.org holds the execution loop, inbox-zero keeps its routing, and "fix speedrun" is a thin preset over it. The spec also designs an effectiveness-measurement trial (a per-task metrics log plus periodic org-roam synthesis articles). The second spec wires light KB-contribution prompts into four workflows plus a curated best-practices node. Both tasks now carry a review VERIFY. The wrap-up-routing implementation stays open: it moves tasks between projects' todo.org files, so it needs a focused session with a data-loss checkpoint, not a tail-end rush.