| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The spec recommended an Emacs keystroke mode (task-review.el). Implementation went the other way — a pure Claude workflow, no elisp — because the interactive mode would couple a rulesets-owned file to archsetup's init.el, and the daily Claude touchpoint already exists in daily-prep. I added a Revision section at the top recording the change: pure workflow, rulesets-owned, the task-review.org / open-tasks.org name swap, the staleness --list selection, and the startup nudge promoted to template-level. The elisp architecture and ERT sections stay as a record of the abandoned approach, flagged superseded.
The todo task moves to DOING with per-component status: everything but the smoke test is done, and component 3 (the elisp) is dropped.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
docs/design/task-review.org captures the brainstorm output for a daily 5-min keystroke-driven review habit that walks 7 oldest-unreviewed top-level [#A]/[#B]/[#C] tasks per session, rotating through the list over ~12 days. Replaces wrap-it-up.org's date-coverage scan once implemented; the watchdog flips from "do all priorities have dates?" to "is the review habit happening?" with a 30-day threshold.
todo.org gets a [#A] entry at the top of Rulesets Open Work pointing at the spec, so the implementation work isn't lost. Six components in the spec's Next Steps: extract task-review-staleness.sh, replace the wrap-up section, author task-review.el in archsetup, author the workflow file plus INDEX entry, add the startup nudge, smoke test.
|
|
|
Four chained Claude Code skills covering the full architecture lifecycle:
arch-design Intake (stakeholders, scale, quality attributes, constraints)
→ candidate paradigms with honest trade-off analysis
→ recommendation + open-decision list
→ .architecture/brief.md
arch-decide ADR creation and management. Five template variants (MADR,
Nygard, Y-statement, lightweight, RFC). Lifecycle, review
process, adr-tools automation.
Forked from wshobson/agents (MIT). LICENSE preserved.
arch-document Full arc42-structured documentation (12 sections) from brief
+ ADRs + codebase. Dispatches to c4-analyze / c4-diagram for
Context, Building Block, Runtime, Deployment diagrams.
arch-evaluate Audits implementation against stated architecture.
Framework-agnostic checks (cyclic deps, stated-layer
violations, public API drift, forbidden deps) run on any
language. Opportunistically invokes language-specific linters
when configured (dependency-cruiser for TS, import-linter for
Python, go vet + depguard for Go). Never installs tooling.
Supporting docs at docs/architecture/:
- README.md suite overview, install steps, per-language linter install
commands (Python import-linter, TS dependency-cruiser, Go
golangci-lint, Java ArchUnit future, C/C++ IWYU future),
typical flow through the chain
- v2-todo.org deferred features (auto-gen linter configs, ArchUnit, CI
mode, DDD aggregate boundaries, visual dep graphs, retroactive
layering inference)
Makefile SKILLS extended with the four new entries; make install symlinks
them to ~/.claude/skills/ alongside existing skills.
Landscape: arch-decide fills the well-covered ADR bucket by adopting the
strongest community offering rather than reinventing. arch-design and
arch-evaluate fill gaps where no general-purpose skill existed. arch-document
fills the arc42 gap (C4 diagrams already covered by sibling skills).
|
