| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | chore(ai): archive session record and wrap-up lint followups | Craig Jennings | 2026-05-17 | 1 | -0/+15 |
| | | |||||
| * | chore(ai): archive session record and wrap-up lint followups | Craig Jennings | 2026-05-16 | 1 | -0/+15 |
| | | | | | Records today's task-review spec + google-keep MCP install work. Lint-followups carries one misplaced-heading judgment (line 2153, false positive — `**` inside `=...=` verbatim) and a 9-entry date-coverage list, both deferred per the task-review spec's plan to retire the date-coverage scan once implemented. | ||||
| * | chore(inbox): track inbox/ with a .gitkeep so it persists across sessions | Craig Jennings | 2026-05-16 | 1 | -0/+0 |
| | | |||||
| * | chore(inbox): remove sync-child-priority spec — implemented | Craig Jennings | 2026-05-14 | 1 | -69/+0 |
| | | |||||
| * | docs(respond-to-cj-comments): add no-cj-token-in-replies rule + ↵ | Craig Jennings | 2026-05-14 | 1 | -0/+69 |
| child-priority-sync spec Skill update: refer to processed items as "cj comments" in chat replies, summaries, and todo.org entries — never write the literal token in my output. The reason is search hygiene: Craig greps his files for the token to find pending annotations, and noise from my replies clutters that. Spec drop into inbox/: child-priority-sync-todo-cleanup.md captures the implementation recommendation for adding --sync-child-priority to todo-cleanup.el plus four open questions (sync direction, opt-out mechanism for deliberately-lower children, auto-apply vs --check, no-priority-parent edge case) Craig needs to answer before wiring it in. | |||||
