| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The python and typescript bundles carried rules and a coverage script but no pre-commit hook, so any project installing one got no credential scan on commit. Both now ship all four components the README documents: the shared secret scan, a validate-on-edit hook, settings wiring, and a seed CLAUDE.md. Verified against a real repo: a commit carrying an AWS key is refused.
install-lang now warns when a bundle is missing a documented component. That's the half that keeps this from recurring. Whoever adds the sixth bundle will forget something too, and today the installer prints success either way.
Two things fell out of the build. node --check is unusable on TypeScript: it ignores --experimental-strip-types, so it rejects valid TS and accepts broken TS. The hook uses tsc filtered to syntactic diagnostics instead. And completing the bundles means every pair now collides on settings.json and pre-commit, so no two compose without FORCE=1. The earlier "bundles already compose" reading rested on these two being incomplete. Filed for a real decision; clock-panel is the project that wants it.
Also stamps :LAST_REVIEWED: at task creation, with a lint checker to catch misses. Writing a task is reviewing it, so leaving the stamp off pushed every fresh task to the top of the next review batch to be re-derived by someone with less context than its author had. Tonight's sweep sent the staleness count from 13 to 22 while the list got more accurate.
|
|
|
Second language in the coverage-summary fan-out, after the Elisp pilot. Same kernel: a module no test imports never appears in coverage.py's report, so a line-weighted total skips it silently and the suite looks healthier than it is. This counts every source file on disk that's absent from the report as 0% and weights the project number by file, so untested modules stay visible.
The script at languages/python/claude/scripts/coverage-summary.py parses coverage.py's JSON (files[path].summary.covered_lines / num_statements), resolves report paths against the report's directory since coverage records them relative to where it ran, and recurses the source dir for *.py. Unlike the Elisp version it doesn't print a per-file table, because coverage.py's own coverage report already does. The script adds the missing-file accounting that report lacks. It uses only the standard library, parsing the report rather than importing coverage.
The Python run confirmed the plumbing from the pilot is genuinely generic. install-lang and sync deliver the script and the project-owned coverage-makefile.txt with no Python-specific code. The one gap I had to close: the Python bundle shipped without a gitignore-add.txt, so the .claude/ footprint wasn't ignored and the script would have been committable. Added one mirroring the Elisp footprint plus Python artifacts (__pycache__, .coverage, coverage.json). make test gained a languages/*/tests/test_*.py discovery path alongside the existing Elisp ERT one.
Tests: 12 pytest covering the parser, the file-weighted number, and the missing-file detection including subpackage recursion, plus an install-lang check that the script lands in the gitignored footprint. I proved it against a report matching coverage.py's documented schema and the CLI end to end, but not against a live coverage json run, because coverage.py isn't installed in this repo's env. The first project to adopt it should sanity-check against a real report.
|
