| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Overnight hygiene sweep of this repo. Everything here is a finding or a staged proposal. No rule, workflow, script, or bundle file was modified.
The one that matters: the python and typescript language bundles ship no pre-commit hook, so a project installing either gets no credential scan on commit. Both bundles predate the hook rollout that swept go and bash, and install-lang skips missing components without a word, so it went unnoticed for two months. Live on two projects, one of them work. Filed [#A].
Seven more findings landed. The largest is a non-atomic write in the cross-project inbox tool, which can strand an empty handoff in another project's inbox and block a turn there. The rest are lint noise and two gaps in the Signal channel. An eighth was filed and then retracted the same night, once a retest showed I had compared two different files and read the difference as a bug.
Four proposals from other projects are staged under working/ with verified diffs, each behind a VERIFY task, waiting on a decision.
|
| |
|
|
| |
The autonomous-batch spec's three source artifacts (the Phase E proposal, its diff, the sender note) moved from working/inbox-zero-phase-e/ into docs/design/ under dated names, with the spec's inbound links repointed. The spec is IMPLEMENTED, so the working dir was a filing candidate. Also removed the spent working/sentry-2026-07-19-working-files-ruling/ staging dir, whose proposal shipped in the working/-tracked-from-creation change. working/ is now empty and gone.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Home's colloquialisms + "the list" before-close-queue handoff was already wired canonically before it arrived (protocols.org Colloquialisms section + wrap-it-up Before-Close Queue drain step); replied to confirm, filed.
The .emacs.d working/ tracked-from-creation ruling is a shared-asset + convention change carrying a temp/-placement design decision, so it parks rather than applying unattended: staged proposal under working/, filed a [#B] VERIFY, replied to .emacs.d with the two findings (canonical never ignored working/; temp/ needs a both-modes ignore call).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Every org document an agent writes carried `#+AUTHOR: Craig Jennings & Claude`. No template stamps that line. Agents copy it from a neighboring file, so one stray header propagates through everything generated afterward.
My own repos tolerate the co-author line. Employers whose policy is that work product carries employee names alone do not. An `#+AUTHOR:` line survives conversion into docx, a wiki page, or a PDF that reaches a customer.
I rewrote the header to `Craig Jennings` across the workflows, templates, specs, and design docs. The rule now lives in commits.md, so the next generated document starts correct rather than inheriting the mistake.
Archived session logs keep their original headers as a record of what happened. The two Codex-authored design docs keep their byline, because Codex wrote them and relabeling would be a false attribution rather than the removal of one.
|
| |
|
|
| |
build_candidates() only scanned ~/.emacs.d, ~/code/*, and ~/projects/*, so ~/.dotfiles (a bootstrapped AI project living directly in $HOME) never showed in the launcher picker. I added it as an explicit candidate next to ~/.emacs.d. The maybe_add_candidate guard keys off .ai/protocols.org, so the line stays inert where ~/.dotfiles isn't bootstrapped.
|
| |
|
|
| |
An archsetup handoff asks to add ~/.dotfiles to the ai launcher's project discovery, completing the dotfiles bootstrap from earlier. bin/ai is a synced asset and this arrived in a no-approvals loop, so it parks as a VERIFY with the prepared one-line diff rather than self-applying.
|
|
|
I processed two .emacs.d handoffs and one roam item. The inbox-zero Phase E proposal (autonomous task execution in a synced template) arrived in a no-approvals session, so it parks as a [#B] VERIFY with the prepared diff under working/, not self-applied. The roam item to wire KB-contribution encouragement into four workflows is filed as a [#C] design task. I dropped its :next: tag because curating the best-practices content needs a decision, not a loop auto-implement.
|
