From 684b27360320868ce2c24b4513c1f806ac4b6b7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Craig Jennings Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 03:25:19 -0500 Subject: feat(workflows): backfill iteration history in spec workflows Closes the org-drill backfill TODO. Both workflow files now carry a bottom "Review and iteration history" section with four entries: Draft 1 (linear-emacs origin, 2026-05-23, placeholder timestamp), Review-and-Fold (commit 7f2aea1, 2026-05-23), Requirement addition (commit 55adf6e, 2026-05-28), and this backfill commit. Canonical and mirror updated together. Working directory working/spec-workflows-iteration-history-backfill/ removed on this commit. The spec-response cycle on the working draft (two Codex reviews, three rulesets responses) validated the entry-shape and the content before splice. Codex caught file-history conflation that would have made per-file provenance inaccurate. Craig's direct rationale on the Iteration 1 and Iteration 3 Why lines replaced the original INFERRED markers. --- todo.org | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'todo.org') diff --git a/todo.org b/todo.org index 6d63109..1642b1c 100644 --- a/todo.org +++ b/todo.org @@ -1189,7 +1189,8 @@ Before any implementation: needs a real review pass on the spec, and a decision :LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-05-28 :END: -** TODO [#C] Iteration-history backfill for spec-review and spec-response :docs:followup: +** DONE [#C] Iteration-history backfill for spec-review and spec-response :docs:followup: +CLOSED: [2026-05-28 Thu] Source: org-drill inbox 2026-05-28. Once the in-flight WIP lands (the requirement that specs carry a bottom =Review and iteration history= section, with iteration / date / contributor / role / what / why / artifacts), backfill the two workflow files themselves using rulesets' session history as evidence. -- cgit v1.2.3