diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/2026-06-10-tool-evaluation-criteria.org')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/2026-06-10-tool-evaluation-criteria.org | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/docs/2026-06-10-tool-evaluation-criteria.org b/docs/2026-06-10-tool-evaluation-criteria.org index f5fec34..be0a79a 100644 --- a/docs/2026-06-10-tool-evaluation-criteria.org +++ b/docs/2026-06-10-tool-evaluation-criteria.org @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ A replacement tool earns adoption only when it beats the incumbent on a dimensio * Weighting criteria (compare on these) - Daily-use win: does it remove a real friction, or is it novelty? "Answers in one command what took a pipeline" (dust) beats "same answer, prettier" (gping). - Workflow fit: Emacs (dired, vterm, magit) and tmux already own many niches. A candidate duplicating them adds maintenance surface without adding capability (see: terminal tabs/splits, broot vs dired+zoxide). -- Theme-system fit: can set-theme drive it (INI/TOML include, runtime color escape, reload signal)? Tools that can't follow dupre/hudson stay second-class. +- Theme-system fit: can the Dupre apply path drive it (INI/TOML include, runtime color escape, reload signal)? Tools that cannot follow the desktop palette stay second-class. - Packaging: official repo > AUR > git build. Every step down adds update fragility to fresh installs. - Migration cost: config translation, muscle-memory retraining, installer changes. Cost scales with how load-bearing the incumbent is. |