1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/docs/specs/2026-08-25-topgrade-guarded-upgrade-spec.org b/docs/specs/2026-08-25-topgrade-guarded-upgrade-spec.org
index e19ea6c..ae456a5 100644
--- a/docs/specs/2026-08-25-topgrade-guarded-upgrade-spec.org
+++ b/docs/specs/2026-08-25-topgrade-guarded-upgrade-spec.org
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ Spec text:
 - L193: "The =--only system= scope … shrink this to near zero".
 
 Git history:
-- =git show 77447d0:…spec.org= L64 has the identical ExecStart sentence, so it was never revised.
+- =git show a50fb3b:…spec.org= L64 has the identical ExecStart sentence, so it was never revised.
 - The uncommitted diff touches only the script name and the containers flag, not L69.
 
 Live system:
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ Disposition: modified, folded into Design, Alternatives. Confirmed. Its proposed
   - L155 (Phase 1): =scripts/upgrade-guarded=, with "=--complete= (... stamp when the deferred set is empty)".
   - L161 (Phase 3): "=ExecStart= runs the script's =--complete= form as the user".
   - L173 (AC): "via the Phase-1 path".
-- Draft provenance: =git show 77447d0:docs/specs/2026-08-25-topgrade-guarded-upgrade-spec.org= has the L71 text verbatim at its line 66 and the L93 text at its line 88. That draft's Phase 1 (its line 119) reads "A single =maint= entry point (=maint apply-upgrade=, ...)". Commit e777ddc rewrote the phases around the script but left these lines in place.
+- Draft provenance: =git show a50fb3b:docs/specs/2026-08-25-topgrade-guarded-upgrade-spec.org= has the L71 text verbatim at its line 66 and the L93 text at its line 88. That draft's Phase 1 (its line 119) reads "A single =maint= entry point (=maint apply-upgrade=, ...)". Commit 068306e rewrote the phases around the script but left these lines in place.
 - No implementation exists: =grep -rn "apply.upgrade" ~/.dotfiles/maint/src= finds nothing, and the only archsetup hits are in this spec.
 - Adjacent stale text: L69's ExecStart still lists "=topgrade --only system= ... then =maint stamp topgrade= on success". That conflicts with L142 and L161.
 :END:
@@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ Spec docs/specs/2026-08-25-topgrade-guarded-upgrade-spec.org:
 - L193: "verified in Phase 2".
 - L200: "Phase-1 and Phase-3 logic under the maint fake harness; Phase-2 install under =tests/installer-steps/=".
 
-The stale lines come from the first draft. In git show 77447d0, the phases are: Phase 1 "Stamp the safe-completion path", Phase 2 "The armed boot-time unit (archsetup)", Phase 3 "The arming affordance (dotfiles maint)". Its lines 148, 154 and 159 match the current L187, L193 and L200 word for word.
+The stale lines come from the first draft. In git show a50fb3b, the phases are: Phase 1 "Stamp the safe-completion path", Phase 2 "The armed boot-time unit (archsetup)", Phase 3 "The arming affordance (dotfiles maint)". Its lines 148, 154 and 159 match the current L187, L193 and L200 word for word.
 
 Test conventions:
 - tests/hypr-live-update-guard/test_hypr_live_update_guard.py:1-21 is unittest with HYPR_GUARD_* env-var seams, and its docstring says "python3 -m unittest tests.hypr-live-update-guard...".
@@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ Spec docs/specs/2026-08-25-topgrade-guarded-upgrade-spec.org:
 - L57: "vNext: none open — the kernel deferral that was vNext is now part of v1's held set."
 - L136: "the kernel deferral is now standing, so the dedicated session has to happen on a cadence (security fixes ride the kernel), and the panel's deferred count carries a kernel most days"
 - L197: "The panel's deferred row is the reminder; a stale-kernel age in maint is a possible follow-up."
-- git show 77447d0 L54, the original vNext: "fold the same arm-and-reboot pattern into a live-kernel-upgrade prompt (log to todo.org)". e777ddc, the decision-closing commit, added L57's "none open" and L197 together.
+- git show a50fb3b L54, the original vNext: "fold the same arm-and-reboot pattern into a live-kernel-upgrade prompt (log to todo.org)". 068306e, the decision-closing commit, added L57's "none open" and L197 together.
 
 todo.org:
 - :739-740: "...file the vNext =[#D]= kernel-reboot item, and commit the spec."
@@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ Disposition: modified, folded into Summary, Goals and Non-Goals, Design, Alterna
 - Spec L61: "...while the ordinary full sweep stays a normal live =topgrade= run."
 - Spec L158 (Phase 2): "UPDATE and TOPGRADE levers change their =argv= to the script".
 - Spec L65: the script runs pacman -Syu --ignore=..., then yay -Sua, then topgrade --disable system,git_repos,containers -y.
-- git show 77447d0 has the identical Summary at draft L25, Goals at draft L40-43, and the L61 sentence at draft L58. Draft L60 is "Three pieces, at two altitudes." with nothing after it, but current L63 appends "— but the everyday gesture is not a reboot. It is a normal live update that simply leaves the dangerous few behind." So L63 has been edited and is not verbatim.
+- git show a50fb3b has the identical Summary at draft L25, Goals at draft L40-43, and the L61 sentence at draft L58. Draft L60 is "Three pieces, at two altitudes." with nothing after it, but current L63 appends "— but the everyday gesture is not a reboot. It is a normal live update that simply leaves the dangerous few behind." So L63 has been edited and is not verbatim.
 - Current L65/L67/L69 are three bold-labelled paragraphs (split script, user, implementer).
 - Mitigations already in the spec: L13 (history line naming the live split upgrade as the everyday path), L51 and L55 (the split script named as v1), L167 (acceptance criterion for the live UPDATE).
 - Labels: L90 "D. ... (this spec)" vs L95 "E. ... (this spec's everyday path)".