docs(theme-selector): incorporate Codex review into the package-faces spec

I ran spec-response against Codex's review. Added implementation phases, acceptance criteria, the package-face inventory source, and state/export semantics with a source field that distinguishes seeded defaults from user edits from deliberate clears. The inventory is hybrid and split: the generated all-package path is its own phase after org, magit, and elfeed, so the three bespoke apps don't wait on it and the scope-explosion risk Codex flagged stays contained.

Two findings I modified with reasons in the dispositions section, the rest accepted. Renamed the spec to -spec.org for the workflow precondition. The rubric is now Ready with caveats, and three decisions stay open for me: the inheritance representation, hybrid-vs-curated-only inventory, and the custom picker timing.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions