feat(workflows): add suspend and readability-audit workflows

suspend is a capture-only mid-session pause for an abrupt departure: it writes a resume-weighted entry and leaves the session anchor in place, so the next startup resumes from it. It's the capture half. Startup is the resume half. I registered it with its trigger phrases.

readability-audit is a language-agnostic pass over comments, file headers, names, and organization. The cheap comment and name fixes land inline. Structural findings get filed as :refactor: tasks. It feeds /refactor rather than duplicating it.

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/.ai/workflows/INDEX.org b/.ai/workflows/INDEX.org
index eef81df..807410d 100644
--- a/.ai/workflows/INDEX.org
+++ b/.ai/workflows/INDEX.org
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ This index must list every =.org= file in =.ai/workflows/= except this one and e
   - Triggers: "wrap it up", "that's a wrap", "let's call it a wrap"
   - No-teardown triggers: "wrap it up with summary", "wrap it up and summarize"
   - Shutdown trigger: "wrap it up and shutdown"
+- =suspend.org= — capture-only mid-session pause for an abrupt departure: append a resume-weighted =SUSPENDED= entry to the Session Log, note uncommitted work, and LEAVE =.ai/session-context.org= in place so the next startup resumes from it. The capture-only counterpart to =wrap-it-up= (which archives + tears down) and to =flush= (=/flush=, which prompts =/clear= and resumes the same session). Provides only the capture half; startup's interrupted-session path is the resume half.
+  - Triggers: "suspend the session", "suspend", "I need to go", "stick a pin in everything"
 - =retrospective.org= — post-mortem after a tough session.
   - Triggers: "let's do a retrospective", "retrospective time"
 
@@ -87,6 +89,11 @@ This index must list every =.org= file in =.ai/workflows/= except this one and e
 - =spec-response.org= — fold a spec review back in: decide accept / modify / reject for every finding, weave accepts into the spec body, complete each finding task in place (the reason recorded on modifies and rejects), reconcile cross-spec tensions, iterate to implementation-ready. The *author* side; consumes the =* Review findings= =spec-review.org= produces.
   - Triggers: "respond to the review", "process the spec reviews", "spec-response workflow", "fold in the review"
 
+** Code quality
+
+- =readability-audit.org= — make code readable to a future maintainer: audit file-top commentary, inline comments (why-not-what), names (intention-revealing), and organization (co-location / stepdown / cohesion). The cheap comment- and name-only fixes (dimensions A/B/C) land inline, verified by a green suite; the structural findings (dimension D — split a module, rename a public symbol) are *filed* as =:refactor:= tasks, not done here. Language-agnostic. Feeds =/refactor= (which executes the filed structural work); distinct from =/refactor='s metric scans and =/simplify='s diff cleanup.
+  - Triggers: "let's run the readability-audit workflow", "audit the comments and commentary in <area>", "clean up the structure/organization of <module>", "readability audit"
+
 ** Tools and meta
 
 - =process-meeting-transcript.org= — record → transcript → labeled archive.