docs(commands): trim two command descriptions under listing cap

Both descriptions ran past Claude Code's per-entry listing cap (~1536 chars), so the menu blurb got truncated. start-work was 1680, respond-to-cj-comments 1568. I trimmed them to 1513 and 1518, compressing only descriptive prose. Every "Use when" and "Do NOT use" routing trigger stays verbatim, so triggering is unchanged.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/.claude/commands/respond-to-cj-comments.md b/.claude/commands/respond-to-cj-comments.md
index 03452f9..7ee3909 100644
--- a/.claude/commands/respond-to-cj-comments.md
+++ b/.claude/commands/respond-to-cj-comments.md
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-description: Scan an org file for cj comments — Craig's annotations wrapped in `#+begin_src cj: ... #+end_src` source blocks — and process each via subagent-delegated accuracy. Each item is classified instruction / question / both, then dispatched to an instruction subagent (proposes a file:line patch) or a question subagent (researches with explicit scope, reports answer + evidence + confidence). Main thread reviews proposals before editing — subagents don't write to the source file. Org-mode TODO parents flip to DOING; new content lands under timestamped subheadings one level deeper; on completion, top and second-level tasks advance to `DONE` while third-level-and-deeper tasks get their heading rewritten to a dated action description (no DONE keyword) so they become an in-place event log. VERIFY tasks at any depth flip to dated log entries on completion with body replaced by the answer or action taken. Public-facing writing (commits, PRs, Slack, email, public docs) gets `/voice personal`; private writing skips the voice pass. Summary lists handled instructions, answered questions with evidence + confidence, follow-ups, unresolved items, and an explicit clean / N-remain verdict. Anything needing Craig's input becomes a `VERIFY` task in `todo.org` (top-level or first-level child of a parent task — never deeper) rather than a separate summary file. File/URL references render as clickable org-mode links. Use when an org file accumulates cj comments. Do NOT use for general code review (`/review-code`), new work without cj comments, or trivial items.
+description: Scan an org file for cj comments — Craig's annotations wrapped in `#+begin_src cj: ... #+end_src` source blocks — and process each via subagent-delegated accuracy. Each item is classified instruction / question / both, then dispatched to an instruction subagent (proposes a file:line patch) or a question subagent (researches with explicit scope, reports answer + evidence + confidence). Main thread reviews proposals before editing; subagents don't write to the source file. Org-mode TODO parents flip to DOING; new content lands under timestamped subheadings one level deeper; on completion, top- and second-level tasks advance to `DONE` while deeper tasks get their heading rewritten to a dated action description (no DONE keyword), becoming an in-place event log. VERIFY tasks at any depth flip to dated log entries with body replaced by the answer or action taken. Public-facing writing (commits, PRs, Slack, email, public docs) gets `/voice personal`; private writing skips it. Summary lists handled instructions, answered questions with evidence + confidence, follow-ups, unresolved items, and an explicit clean / N-remain verdict. Anything needing Craig's input becomes a `VERIFY` task in `todo.org` (top-level or first-level child of a parent task — never deeper) rather than a separate summary file. File/URL references render as clickable org-mode links. Use when an org file accumulates cj comments. Do NOT use for general code review (`/review-code`), new work without cj comments, or trivial items.
 ---
 
 # /respond-to-cj-comments — Process cj Comments in an Org File