docs: level-2 VERIFY completes task-shaped, not as a dated header

The old rule dated a resolved VERIFY at every depth, including the top level. A level-2 dated header carries no keyword, so todo-cleanup's --archive-done can never archive it and task-review drops it from selection. Now a top-level VERIFY closes like any other top-level task (DONE/CANCELLED + CLOSED:), and dated rewrites are reserved for level 3 and deeper. Updated the rule and the three places that encoded the old behavior: todo-format.md, respond-to-cj-comments.md, and process-inbox.org. Also repaired two pre-existing level-2 dated headers.

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/.claude/commands/respond-to-cj-comments.md b/.claude/commands/respond-to-cj-comments.md
index 7ee3909..2f16099 100644
--- a/.claude/commands/respond-to-cj-comments.md
+++ b/.claude/commands/respond-to-cj-comments.md
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-description: Scan an org file for cj comments — Craig's annotations wrapped in `#+begin_src cj: ... #+end_src` source blocks — and process each via subagent-delegated accuracy. Each item is classified instruction / question / both, then dispatched to an instruction subagent (proposes a file:line patch) or a question subagent (researches with explicit scope, reports answer + evidence + confidence). Main thread reviews proposals before editing; subagents don't write to the source file. Org-mode TODO parents flip to DOING; new content lands under timestamped subheadings one level deeper; on completion, top- and second-level tasks advance to `DONE` while deeper tasks get their heading rewritten to a dated action description (no DONE keyword), becoming an in-place event log. VERIFY tasks at any depth flip to dated log entries with body replaced by the answer or action taken. Public-facing writing (commits, PRs, Slack, email, public docs) gets `/voice personal`; private writing skips it. Summary lists handled instructions, answered questions with evidence + confidence, follow-ups, unresolved items, and an explicit clean / N-remain verdict. Anything needing Craig's input becomes a `VERIFY` task in `todo.org` (top-level or first-level child of a parent task — never deeper) rather than a separate summary file. File/URL references render as clickable org-mode links. Use when an org file accumulates cj comments. Do NOT use for general code review (`/review-code`), new work without cj comments, or trivial items.
+description: Scan an org file for cj comments — Craig's annotations wrapped in `#+begin_src cj: ... #+end_src` source blocks — and process each via subagent-delegated accuracy. Each item is classified instruction / question / both, then dispatched to an instruction subagent (proposes a file:line patch) or a question subagent (researches with explicit scope, reports answer + evidence + confidence). Main thread reviews proposals before editing; subagents don't write to the source file. Org-mode TODO parents flip to DOING; new content lands under timestamped subheadings one level deeper; on completion, top- and second-level tasks advance to `DONE` while deeper tasks get their heading rewritten to a dated action description (no DONE keyword), becoming an in-place event log. VERIFY tasks at `***` and deeper flip to dated log entries with body replaced by the answer or action taken; a top-level (`**`) VERIFY instead closes as `DONE`/`CANCELLED` + `CLOSED:` like any top-level task, the answer in its body. Public-facing writing (commits, PRs, Slack, email, public docs) gets `/voice personal`; private writing skips it. Summary lists handled instructions, answered questions with evidence + confidence, follow-ups, unresolved items, and an explicit clean / N-remain verdict. Anything needing Craig's input becomes a `VERIFY` task in `todo.org` (top-level or first-level child of a parent task — never deeper) rather than a separate summary file. File/URL references render as clickable org-mode links. Use when an org file accumulates cj comments. Do NOT use for general code review (`/review-code`), new work without cj comments, or trivial items.
 ---
 
 # /respond-to-cj-comments — Process cj Comments in an Org File
@@ -143,9 +143,9 @@ For **instructions**:
 
    - **Regular `TODO`/`DOING` at `*` or `**`** — advance to `DONE` + `CLOSED:` line; the keyword and original heading stay visible in the agenda.
    - **Regular `TODO`/`DOING` at `***` and deeper** — rewrite the heading to `<depth> YYYY-MM-DD Day @ HH:MM:SS -ZZZZ <past-tense description>`; drop the keyword/priority/tags.
-   - **`VERIFY` at any depth** — dated-heading rewrite *and* a body replacement: replace the body with either the information Craig provided (when the VERIFY was a question) or a description of the action taken (when it was an instruction / pending-decision marker). VERIFYs at `**` follow this rule even though regular `**` DONE tasks stay task-shaped — a resolved VERIFY is an answered question, not a finished task.
+   - **`VERIFY` — depth decides the heading.** At `***` and deeper, a dated-heading rewrite. At `**`, a terminal keyword (`DONE`/`CANCELLED` + `CLOSED:`) like any top-level task — never a dated `**` header. Either way, replace the body with the information Craig provided (when the VERIFY was a question) or a description of the action taken (when it was an instruction / pending-decision marker).
 
-   **VERIFY-answer pattern.** When a cj annotation's `parent_heading_chain` ends with a `VERIFY ...` heading (i.e., the cj sits directly inside a VERIFY task), the cj is Craig's answer to the question that VERIFY held open. The cj content is the source for the dated-rewrite body. Two shapes:
+   **VERIFY-answer pattern.** When a cj annotation's `parent_heading_chain` ends with a `VERIFY ...` heading (i.e., the cj sits directly inside a VERIFY task), the cj is Craig's answer to the question that VERIFY held open. The cj content is the source for the resolved body. Two shapes:
 
    - *Direct answer.* The cj body IS the answer (a value, decision, link, paste from elsewhere). Lift the cj body verbatim into the new dated body; trim filler ("okay," "approved," "yes,") that isn't load-bearing.
    - *Indirect answer.* The cj points at where the answer lives ("Kostya gave this in Slack — pull it from DM channel X," "see the attached doc"). Execute the instruction first (per step 3 — subagent if research is needed), then the resolved info becomes the dated body.
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ For **instructions**:
    Both shapes land at the same end state:
 
    1. Generate the timestamp with `date "+%Y-%m-%d %a @ %H:%M:%S %z"`.
-   2. Rewrite the VERIFY heading to its dated form (depth-preserving) with a short summary of what got answered.
+   2. Rewrite the VERIFY heading by depth: at `***` and deeper, its dated form with a short summary of what got answered; at `**`, a `DONE`/`CANCELLED` keyword + `CLOSED:` line with the heading text kept.
    3. Replace the body with the resolved info (the cj body for direct, the executed result for indirect).
    4. Delete the cj annotation — it's now folded into the body. Don't keep both.