chore(intake): file org-drill iteration-history backfill as TODO

The org-drill inbox asks rulesets to backfill =Review and iteration history= sections on spec-review.org and spec-response.org. It lands as a follow-up TODO because the requirement itself is still being established in uncommitted WIP.

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/todo.org b/todo.org
index 36c45b1..cd07172 100644
--- a/todo.org
+++ b/todo.org
@@ -1189,6 +1189,23 @@ Before any implementation: needs a real review pass on the spec, and a decision
 :LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-05-28
 :END:
 
+** TODO [#C] Iteration-history backfill for spec-review and spec-response :docs:followup:
+Source: org-drill inbox 2026-05-28.
+
+Once the in-flight WIP lands (the requirement that specs carry a bottom =Review and iteration history= section, with iteration / date / contributor / role / what / why / artifacts), backfill the two workflow files themselves using rulesets' session history as evidence.
+
+Files to update:
+- =claude-templates/.ai/workflows/spec-review.org=
+- =claude-templates/.ai/workflows/spec-response.org=
+
+Investigation: search =.ai/sessions/=, =.ai/notes.org=, inbox archive, and git log for mentions of these workflow docs. Identify review/response/design iterations, dates, and contributors (including agents where known: Claude Code, Codex, local models). Distinguish high-confidence history (commits, dated session entries) from inferred (chat-only context). Recommend whether enough evidence exists to populate the section, and draft the entries if so.
+
+Dependency: do not start until the spec-review/spec-response WIP is committed. The requirement itself is still being finalized.
+
+:PROPERTIES:
+:LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-05-28
+:END:
+
 * Rulesets Resolved
 ** DONE [#C] Fix =cj-scan= false positives on cj fences nested inside other =#+begin_*= blocks :bug:
 CLOSED: [2026-05-15 Fri]