aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCraig Jennings <c@cjennings.net>2026-05-22 15:53:17 -0500
committerCraig Jennings <c@cjennings.net>2026-05-22 15:53:17 -0500
commit81280b71efe7b065fb1ccbf205a704c7425bc3f8 (patch)
tree0c03bdb19ffabb6de1b5239fadac4866320132f1
parentb86b745b83a0d360b5d56dd439b743b13f8f96dd (diff)
downloadrulesets-81280b71efe7b065fb1ccbf205a704c7425bc3f8.tar.gz
rulesets-81280b71efe7b065fb1ccbf205a704c7425bc3f8.zip
chore(todo): close brainstorm audit item
-rw-r--r--todo.org9
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/todo.org b/todo.org
index 4457927..0d93573 100644
--- a/todo.org
+++ b/todo.org
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ Each item below is a one-line summary of a sub-TODO further down. Tick the box w
- [X] [#B] =five-whys=: require evidence + counterfactual validation per why
**** Brainstorming
-- [ ] [#B] =brainstorm=: timebox + research/source rules for high-stakes designs
+- [X] [#B] =brainstorm=: timebox + research/source rules for high-stakes designs
**** Architecture
- [X] [#B] =arch-decide=: timeless examples, drop unverifiable claims
@@ -955,12 +955,9 @@ Rewrote step b in =root-cause-trace/SKILL.md=: instead of "add a check at each l
Expanded step 2 in =five-whys/SKILL.md=: each link now owes an evidence field (a log/commit/metric/config you can point to) and a counterfactual check (remove this cause — does the symptom above plausibly not happen?). Framed the counterfactual as the main guard against monocausal storytelling, and updated the worked example to show both fields.
-*** TODO [#A] =brainstorm=: add timebox and research/source rules for high-stakes designs
+*** 2026-05-22 Fri @ 15:51:59 -0500 Added timebox + fresh-sources rules to brainstorm
-The one-question-at-a-time flow can run long. Add a timebox and a rule that
-claims about markets, regulations, tools, vendors, or current APIs require
-fresh sources. The design doc should distinguish researched facts from
-assumptions.
+Phase 1 gained a "Timebox the dialogue" rule (aim for the one-sentence restatement in ~5-8 questions, then move on and park the rest as open questions). Phase 2 gained "Ground high-stakes claims in fresh sources" (check load-bearing claims about markets/regulations/tools/vendors/APIs against a current source; mark unverified ones as assumptions). The design-doc skeleton gained an "## Assumptions" section that distinguishes researched facts (with source) from assumptions (to confirm before building).
*** 2026-05-22 Fri @ 14:59:32 -0500 Made arch-decide examples timeless + required citations