chore: record the inbox batch and file deferred lint itemsHEADmain

I processed twelve handoffs across five senders. The work itself landed in the seven commits before this one, and this carries the record plus three deferred lint judgments for the morning.

2 files changed, 334 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/.ai/sessions/2026-08-05-18-49-inbox-batch-quiet-form-and-anchor-scope.org b/.ai/sessions/2026-08-05-18-49-inbox-batch-quiet-form-and-anchor-scope.org
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0a5399
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.ai/sessions/2026-08-05-18-49-inbox-batch-quiet-form-and-anchor-scope.org
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+#+TITLE: Session Context — 2026-08-04
+#+AUTHOR: Craig Jennings
+#+DATE: 2026-08-04
+
+* Summary
+
+** Active Goal
+
+Startup found nine handoffs waiting and three more arrived during the session.
+The whole session became one long inbox pass: evaluate twelve items across five
+senders, verify every checkable claim against the source rather than the report,
+and ship or file each one.
+
+** Decisions
+
+- *Verify before grading, every time.* Every report that made a factual claim
+  got checked against the source first. All of them held, which is the argument
+  for continuing rather than for stopping — the checks were cheap and the one
+  thing they'd have caught is the expensive one.
+- *File wider than reported when the report points at something bigger.* Home
+  asked for =todo.org= in the installer's exclude set. The real gap is that a
+  repo Craig doesn't own is a third mode the installer doesn't model, since
+  gitignore mode commits his personal policy into someone else's tracked file.
+- *Five commits, not one bundle*, because the fixes were independent and a
+  bundled =chore:= would have buried two behavior changes among doc edits.
+- *Craig lifted the Agent-tool restriction* where the standing rules call for
+  dispatch, settling a conflict that had surfaced three times in two sessions.
+- *Zero-tolerance on em-dashes applies to new prose even in files carrying 65 of
+  them*, because the profile calls the rule chosen self-discipline rather than a
+  reflection of his habit. That makes the existing ones the pre-rule habit the
+  rule corrects, not a house style to match.
+- *Don't hold work that doesn't depend on the answer.* Home's item was filed
+  identically under every option offered, so it shipped without waiting.
+
+** Data Collected / Findings
+
+*The first dispatched review returned Request Changes with four blocking
+findings, none of which I'd have caught myself.* The worst was a straight
+contradiction: my new quiet-output rule told agents to let exit codes carry a
+pass, while =verification.md= says read the whole output before claiming one.
+Both load into every session, and the obvious targets ("tests pass", "linter is
+clean") are the two commands =verification.md= names. A stale carve-out would
+also have told agents to run the sentry walk inline, defeating the change
+entirely.
+
+*The reviewer then caught me describing a fix I hadn't made* — I called finding
+7 "compressed to a clause" when it was already a clause. Its judgment that the
+gap mattered more than the finding is right, and it's the whole argument for
+continuing the same reviewer rather than spawning a fresh one.
+
+*Verified against source, not taken on trust:* the signature paths really are
+dead and the marks moved to =~/pictures/signature/=; =lo--spec-file-p= scopes
+five checkers, not the four its docstring claimed; all five language bundles
+carry the identical unconditional tooling block; teardown really has no
+live-sibling gate where shutdown mode calls that gate load-bearing; every step
+of =.emacs.d='s telega chain holds against telega 20260706.2147; =agent-lock= is
+name-keyed and mkdir-atomic.
+
+*=$TMUX_PANE= is stable across an agent's Bash calls* (=%19= twice this
+session). That's a fourth option archsetup's anchor proposal didn't list, and it
+beats all three of theirs by keeping the resolver a pure function of its
+environment.
+
+*The website report was overtaken by events* — the sync narrowing landed four
+minutes before it was written.
+
+*The lint fix is confirmed working downstream.* Work replied at 18:37 that all
+three synced files arrived on their evening template sync, and that their live
+session anchor now lints =mechanical=0 judgment=0= against 14 judgment items
+that morning, 12 of them the =level-2-dated-header= false positive. That is the
+end-to-end verification I couldn't run from here, measured in the project that
+reported the bug.
+
+They also closed the one thing I asked of them: the sentry arming prompt is
+typed at =/loop= time rather than stored in a file, so there was nothing to
+patch, and the correction went into their local memory instead. They kept the
+verification-exemption half of that memory deliberately rather than pruning it,
+on the grounds that it's the half most likely to be read past.
+
+*Orphan KB nodes went 42 → 113 while agent nodes doubled*, so nearly every node
+written since 2026-07-01 landed unlinked. That reframes the orphan task from a
+cleanup backlog into a write-path problem.
+
+** Files Modified
+
+Seven commits, all pushed.
+
+- =fc1a519= =lint-org.el= + tests — the anchor scope fix, suite 77 → 82.
+- =7637a97= =triage-intake.telegram.org= — =#'ignore= on both =loadChats= calls.
+- =57dae70= =triage-intake.personal-gmail.org= — the date-slice floor.
+- =771c669= =protocols.org= — signature section rewritten to a three-row table.
+- =91ac5a1= =todo.org= — four filings from the batch.
+- =cf9910d= =todo.org= — the collaborator-repo installer gap.
+- =588fbf6= =interaction.md=, =subagents.md=, =sentry.org= — quiet output plus
+  the Output-Destination Override.
+
+KB: promoted 2 / consulted yes
+
+** Next Steps
+
+1. *Craig's two standing reminders are both still open* and both need his
+   decisions rather than execution: the context-engineering rightsizing (four
+   decisions, docs one commit behind) and the sentry spec deep read, now three
+   weeks old.
+2. *The teardown live-sibling gate =[#B]=* is the sharpest thing filed tonight —
+   it would have killed a running session. Needs a real two-session drill, so
+   it's not =:solo:=.
+3. *The agent-anchor default =[#B]=* now carries the =$TMUX_PANE= option; decide
+   between it and archsetup's three before building.
+4. *The inbox Stop hook fired three times* on an item that was mid-disposition,
+   where protocols.org says it should step aside on re-entry. Worth checking
+   whether the soft-nudge is behaving as designed.
+5. Twenty-nine tasks remain unreviewed past a week.
+
+* Session Log
+
+** 00:30 — Startup
+
+Ran the startup workflow. Phase A.0: rulesets already current, =make install=
+had nothing new to link, project repo clean and up to date. Phase A: templates
+synced cleanly, no session-context anchor from a prior session (last wrap was
+clean), language bundle silent, spec-sort and host-identity probes silent.
+
+Findings to carry: 29 top-level tasks unreviewed for >7 days, 3 items in the
+roam global inbox, and nine new handoffs in =inbox/= since the 2026-07-31
+process marker — one from website, one KB hygiene report, four from work, two
+from archsetup.
+
+** 00:45 — Inbox pass: evaluation
+
+Ran the value gate and skeptical review over all nine handoffs, verifying every
+checkable claim against the source rather than taking the reports at face value.
+All four verifications confirmed the senders:
+
+- The signature paths in =protocols.org= really are dead; dotfiles moved the
+  marks to =~/pictures/signature/= and added an initials stamp the section
+  never mentions.
+- =lo--spec-file-p= scopes out the todo-format family for =/docs/specs/= only,
+  and a session anchor has the same property by instruction (=protocols.org=
+  line 120 prescribes the dated =** = log heading). Its docstring says four
+  checkers; the call site excludes five.
+- All five language bundles append the same unconditional tooling block
+  (=.claude/=, =CLAUDE.md=, =githooks/=) in =gitignore-add.txt=, so the
+  track-mode defect work hit is not python-specific.
+- Teardown mode really has no live-sibling gate: shutdown mode gates on
+  =cj/ai-term-live-count= and calls it "the load-bearing safety of the whole
+  feature," while teardown drops its sentinel unguarded and the hook then kills
+  the whole =aiv-<project>= tmux session, windows and all.
+
+One thing I found that archsetup's anchor proposal missed: =$TMUX_PANE= is
+exported into the agent's Bash environment and stable across calls (=%19= on
+two separate invocations this session). That is a fourth option they did not
+list, and it beats all three of theirs — the resolver stays a pure function of
+the environment, with no minting and no state file.
+
+The website report is partly overtaken by events: the per-path sync narrowing
+(=f69dc22=) landed four minutes before that handoff was written, so the specific
+root cause it names — one dirty =sentry.org= blocking all three rsyncs — no
+longer holds. The asymmetry it describes does.
+
+A tenth handoff arrived from =.emacs.d= at 00:31, mid-evaluation, proposing a
+one-line fix for a repeating telega 404. Craig approved the batch as
+recommended.
+
+** Inbox pass: applied
+
+(Note on times: =date= read 00:30 at startup and 09:51 an hour of work later, so
+the machine's clock moved under this session. Timestamps below are what =date=
+returned when the entry was written; the earlier headings keep what it returned
+then. Not chased — flagging it so the sequence doesn't read as garbled.)
+
+Four implemented, two folded, four filed.
+
+*Implemented.* =protocols.org='s Signature Image section now points at
+=~/pictures/signature/= as a three-row table and names the README that carries
+the sizing guidance — the old prose named two paths that no longer exist. I
+described the stow source as "Craig's dotfiles repo" rather than the specific
+path work quoted: the doc had already rotted once by pinning
+=~/code/archsetup/dotfiles/=, and the marks now resolve through =~/.dotfiles/=.
+The personal-gmail plugin's date-slice recipe is now labelled a floor rather
+than a complete read, with home's 250-vs-291 measurement and the rule for which
+uses can tolerate it. The telegram plugin passes =#'ignore= to both =loadChats=
+calls, with the quick reference updated in the same pass so the two can't drift.
+
+=lint-org.el='s =lo--spec-file-p= became =lo--todo-format-exempt-p=, widened to
+cover the live anchor, per-agent anchors, and the =.ai/sessions/= archives.
+Work flagged honestly that they'd measured only =level-2-dated-header= and were
+inferring the rest; the composite test I wrote red answered it — the other four
+do fire on an anchor. The archives were mine to add: same file, same shape,
+later in its life, and sentry lints them. Suite went 77 → 82.
+
+*Folded.* Work's link sweep into the existing =../../= links bug as independent
+confirmation from the consuming side — same seven sites, and they correctly
+excluded the =inbox.org= template placeholder, which the fix must not sweep up.
+The KB hygiene report into the orphan-review task, where the number reframes it:
+orphans went 42 → 113 while agent nodes doubled, so nearly every node written
+since 2026-07-01 landed unlinked. That makes the backlog a symptom of the write
+path rather than a cleanup queue.
+
+*Filed.* =[#B]= teardown's missing live-sibling gate (the most serious — it
+would have killed a running session), =[#B]= the agent-scoped anchor default,
+=[#C]= install-lang's unconditional tooling ignores, =[#C]= the hook message
+that names a step instead of a command.
+
+** Shipped as five commits, pushed
+
+=fc1a519= the lint-org scope fix, =7637a97= the telega callback, =57dae70= the
+gmail pagination floor, =771c669= the signature paths, =91ac5a1= the four task
+filings. Green suite before and after, zero new lint issues, mirror in sync,
+=0	0= against upstream after the push.
+
+Split into five rather than one because they're independent fixes, and a
+bundled =chore:= would have buried the two behavior changes among the doc edits.
+
+*The review gate ran inline, not isolated.* The =publish= skill requires a
+dispatched reviewer on every commit and =subagents.md= names it as the standing
+isolation-override case, but this session's instructions bar the Agent tool
+unless Craig asks. The skill's own fallback covers it, and I said so plainly at
+the gate rather than letting an inline review pass as an isolated one. It did
+earn its keep: it caught my telega comment claiming the noise multiplied "across
+every project holding a synced copy," when there is one daemon and the synced
+copies only multiply which project can trigger it.
+
+That conflict has now fired twice in two sessions, and work's new handoff makes
+it three — its second rule is "dispatch repeated passes to a subagent." One
+decision from Craig settles all three.
+
+** Two more handoffs mid-commit
+
+=home= reports the installer never excludes =todo.org=, so it lands tracked in a
+collaborator's repo. Verified: both =install-ai.sh='s gitignore block and
+=sweep-gitignore-tooling.sh='s =IGNORE_SET= carry =.ai/=, =.claude/=,
+=CLAUDE.md=, =AGENTS.md= and nothing else. The deeper finding is that the
+collaborator case is a *third* mode the installer has no notion of — in a repo
+Craig doesn't own, the whole set belongs in =.git/info/exclude= rather than
+=.gitignore=, since appending to =.gitignore= pushes his personal policy into
+someone else's tracked file. Ratowsky already worked around it exactly that way.
+
+=work= relays a direct Craig directive: quiet form always, and dispatch repeated
+scheduled passes. Both rules are right and I've been violating the first all
+session.
+
+Home's item got filed as =[#C]= and committed (=cf9910d=) without waiting for
+Craig, because it was filed identically under every option I'd offered him — so
+it wasn't a fork, and holding it would have been ceremony.
+
+** Craig lifted the Agent-tool restriction, and the first dispatched review paid for itself
+
+He chose option 1: implement quiet form into =interaction.md= and
+=subagents.md=, with the Agent tool allowed where the standing rules call for
+dispatch. So the pre-commit review for the rules change went to an isolated
+reviewer, the first this session.
+
+It returned *Request Changes* with four blocking findings, and every one is
+something I would not have caught reviewing my own diff:
+
+1. *The quiet rule contradicted =verification.md= outright.* I wrote "a check
+   that returns the expected result prints nothing" and prescribed
+   =cmd >/dev/null 2>&1=, while =verification.md= says read the whole output
+   before claiming a pass. Both files load into every session, so an agent
+   would have had to resolve that itself, every time — and the obvious targets
+   ("tests pass", "linter is clean") are exactly the two commands
+   =verification.md= names. My rule was instructing agents toward the false
+   pass that file exists to prevent.
+2. *My idiom threw away the diagnostic it then demanded.* =2>&1= to
+   =/dev/null= means the failure branch prints only the placeholder string I
+   typed, eight lines above my own sentence saying deviations print in full.
+3. *"Run these two checks" now sat over three subsections*, and the new one
+   inverted the section's direction: the other two prevent a spawn, mine
+   justifies one.
+4. *Two of three parallel override enumerations went stale*, and one collided
+   with the motivating case — "Don't Subagent At All" refuses dispatch for a
+   known target under ~10 tool calls, which is precisely the shape of the
+   sentry walk. An agent landing there would have correctly concluded "run it
+   inline," defeating the whole change.
+
+Fixed all seven (the three Minor ones too: background is the load-bearing word,
+the thread boundary for lock and commits was left to inference, the anecdote was
+told three times). Verified the lock claim rather than asserting it —
+=agent-lock= is name-keyed and mkdir-atomic, and its header says it exists
+because every agent Bash call is its own shell, so a refresh from the subagent
+holds the lock the main thread acquired.
+
+Sent back to the *same* reviewer per the publish flow, so it can check its own
+findings against the new text rather than a fresh reviewer re-litigating.
+
+Round two: *Approve*. It rated findings 1 and 4 closed more thoroughly than it
+asked, verified the =agent-lock= claim against the helper's source rather than
+taking my word, and raised one new Minor I'd introduced — my preamble said both
+overrides lift both pre-dispatch checks, but Availability is a hard capability
+constraint, not an efficiency rule, and no override can conjure a spawn
+mechanism that isn't there. Fixed rather than deferred.
+
+*It also caught me describing a fix that didn't happen.* I reported finding 7
+(the anecdote told three times) as "compressed to a clause"; the diff shows it
+was already a clause and I changed three words. Its judgment — that the gap is
+worth more than the finding was — is right, and it's the exact failure mode the
+re-review loop exists to catch: had it trusted my summary instead of re-reading
+the text, I'd have gotten away with it. Worth remembering that the loop's value
+is the reviewer checking claims against the diff, not against my account of the
+diff.
+
+** Craig ran /voice bare, mid-flow
+
+Read it as the in-progress draft: the new rule prose, prose mode (these are
+documents he reads in an editor, so personal mode's artifact patterns would
+misfire). It found 12 em-dashes in what I'd written, plus a semicolon,
+uncontracted forms, and stress italics.
+
+The judgment call worth recording: =interaction.md= and =subagents.md= already
+carry 65 em-dashes between them, so new prose following zero-tolerance is
+locally inconsistent with its surroundings. I applied the rule anyway, because
+the profile says zero-tolerance is chosen self-discipline rather than a
+reflection of his habit — which makes the existing 65 the pre-rule habit the
+rule exists to correct, not a house style to match. Flagged it to him rather
+than deciding silently.
+
+Work's handoff is replied to and retired, and the inbox is empty. Shipped as
+=588fbf6=, pushed, tree clean and even with upstream.
diff --git a/inbox/lint-followups.org b/inbox/lint-followups.org
index 21a5ed3..b140944 100644
--- a/inbox/lint-followups.org
+++ b/inbox/lint-followups.org
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 * 2026-07-20 Mon — Task-review health: 1 top-level [#A]/[#B]/[#C] tasks unreviewed for >30 days (daily review may have slipped)
 
-* lint-org follow-ups — todo.org (2026-07-31)
-** TODO misplaced-heading — Possibly misplaced heading line (line 2320)
-** TODO link-to-local-file — Link to non-existent local file "working/hook-fail-open/validate-el.diff" (line 2296)
-** TODO misplaced-planning-info — Misplaced planning info line (line 2285)
-** TODO link-to-local-file — Link to non-existent local file "working/hook-fail-open/pre-commit.diff" (line 2280)
-** TODO misplaced-planning-info — Misplaced planning info line (line 2265)
-** TODO org-table-standard — table violates the org-table standard: no closing rule; missing rule between rows — wrap-org-table.el reflows it (line 371)
-** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 529)
-** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 532)
-** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 539)
-** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 547)
-** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 550)
-** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 559)
-** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 657)
+* lint-org follow-ups — todo.org (2026-08-05)
+** TODO misplaced-heading — Possibly misplaced heading line (line 2593)
+** TODO link-to-local-file — Link to non-existent local file "working/hook-fail-open/validate-el.diff" (line 2569)
+** TODO misplaced-planning-info — Misplaced planning info line (line 2558)
+** TODO link-to-local-file — Link to non-existent local file "working/hook-fail-open/pre-commit.diff" (line 2553)
+** TODO misplaced-planning-info — Misplaced planning info line (line 2538)
+** TODO org-table-standard — table violates the org-table standard: no closing rule; missing rule between rows — wrap-org-table.el reflows it (line 607)
+** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 786)
+** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 789)
+** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 796)
+** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 804)
+** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 807)
 ** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 816)
-** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 825)
+** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 930)
+** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 1089)
+** TODO task-missing-last-reviewed — task has no :LAST_REVIEWED: — stamp it at creation with today's date (a task you just wrote and graded is reviewed); otherwise it enters the next staleness batch as never-reviewed (line 1098)