docs(spec): close the helper-spec review cycle on the second pass

The re-review confirmed every disposition with no new high or medium findings: Phase 1.5 stands at Ready with caveats, phases 2-5 stay parked behind the decisions fence. The response is correspondingly small — the accepted editorial rename of the Emacs subsection (its "open issue / blocks readiness" heading outlived the body, which is now an integration contract) and the second-pass note in the dispositions section. The updated review file and its history and task-tracking edits ride along.

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/docs/design/2026-05-28-generic-agent-runtime-spec.org b/docs/design/2026-05-28-generic-agent-runtime-spec.org
index 0b37814..01be6d4 100644
--- a/docs/design/2026-05-28-generic-agent-runtime-spec.org
+++ b/docs/design/2026-05-28-generic-agent-runtime-spec.org
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ timestamps (=YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-from-<project>-<slug>=). A helper and primary
 sending to the same target in the same minute with the same slug would
 collide; helper-originated sends include the agent id in the slug.
 
-*** Open issue: the Emacs launch surface — unresolved, blocks readiness
+*** Emacs launch surface — integration contract
 
 Corrected 2026-06-12 after reading the actual config (the first draft of
 this subsection assumed eat/vterm and was wrong). The facts, verified in
@@ -954,6 +954,18 @@ Every recommendation from [[file:2026-05-28-generic-agent-runtime-spec-review.or
 
 Rejections: none.
 
+** Second pass — 2026-06-12
+
+The re-review after the fold-in confirmed every disposition (its Agreed
+decisions section accepts the split rubric, the caveats, and the
+one-document structure) and found no new high- or medium-priority issues.
+One optional editorial edit was suggested and accepted: the Emacs
+subsection heading no longer says "open issue / blocks readiness", since
+its body and the Status checklist had already closed it — it now reads
+/Emacs launch surface — integration contract/. The review's drop-in task
+shapes are already represented in todo.org per the review itself; no new
+tasks were filed.
+
 * Review and iteration history
 
 ** 2026-06-12 Fri @ 02:09:10 -0500 — Codex — reviewer
@@ -965,3 +977,13 @@ Rejections: none.
 - What changed: folded the review in. All recommendations accepted except the document-split open question, modified to a dual rubric in one document (see Review dispositions). Status now labels Phase 1.5 READY WITH CAVEATS and phases 2-5 NOT READY; the original readiness checklist is fully resolved.
 - Why: the review's top finding was that one Not-ready label hid an implementable slice; the rest hardened the slice's rollout (per-ring rollbacks, normative test inventory, exact .emacs.d handoff artifact, stale-helper message contract, roster platform behavior) and fenced the parked arc (decisions-required section, Phase 5 reverification prerequisite).
 - Artifacts: this spec's Status, Pre-live gating, Phase 5, Open decisions, and Review dispositions sections; the helper task in todo.org carries the same caveats.
+
+** 2026-06-12 Fri @ 02:39:38 -0500 — Codex — reviewer
+- What changed or was recommended: re-ran the spec-review workflow after the response pass. Rubric by arc: Phase 1.5 helper instances =Ready with caveats=; phases 2-5 runtime-neutral refactor =Not ready=; combined document =ready only for the scoped helper slice. No new blocking findings for Phase 1.5. Optional editorial note: rename the stale "Open issue: the Emacs launch surface" heading now that the body is an integration contract.
+- Why: the response pass accepted or modified every prior recommendation into the spec, so the remaining implementation risk is controlled by the caveats/gates already written. The broader runtime-neutral arc still correctly waits on explicit product decisions and current-source local-runtime verification.
+- Artifacts: [[file:2026-05-28-generic-agent-runtime-spec-review.org][2026-05-28-generic-agent-runtime-spec-review.org]] updated with this second-pass review; existing [[file:../../todo.org][todo.org]] helper/runtime tasks remain the tracking surface.
+
+** 2026-06-12 Fri @ 02:47:07 -0500 — Claude — author (spec-response, second pass)
+- What changed: folded the second review in. Nothing substantive remained to change — the review confirmed all dispositions with zero new high/medium findings — so the response is the accepted editorial heading rename (the Emacs subsection is now /Emacs launch surface — integration contract/) and the second-pass note under Review dispositions.
+- Why: the review cycle has converged. Phase 1.5 stands at Ready-with-caveats with both reviewer and author aligned on the caveats; phases 2-5 stay parked behind the decisions fence.
+- Artifacts: the renamed Emacs subsection; the Review dispositions second-pass note; Codex's second-pass review file and its todo.org/history edits ride in the same commit.