diff options
| author | Craig Jennings <c@cjennings.net> | 2026-05-20 13:41:13 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Craig Jennings <c@cjennings.net> | 2026-05-20 13:41:13 -0400 |
| commit | 3627d5e61e2adc8cd196958f62579fcdf9d20889 (patch) | |
| tree | 414ff2f1968a19c4fa4becdb702dbe027357434d /docs | |
| parent | 845fbd5753a3ca13e9d348d2ef84da8cb9ee2b3a (diff) | |
| download | rulesets-3627d5e61e2adc8cd196958f62579fcdf9d20889.tar.gz rulesets-3627d5e61e2adc8cd196958f62579fcdf9d20889.zip | |
docs(workflows): swap wrap-up date-coverage scan for task-review health check
The date-coverage scan flagged every open [#A]/[#B] task with no DEADLINE or SCHEDULED, on the assumption that high-priority work needs a date. That assumption is wrong (research and watch-list tasks are legitimately dateless), so the scan generated dismiss-or-paper-over cleanup at every wrap-up.
The replacement watches the daily task-review habit instead. It calls task-review-staleness.sh todo.org 30 and, when the count is non-zero, writes one summary line to the follow-ups file: N top-level tasks unreviewed for >30 days. There's no per-task dump, because the per-task walk is the review habit's job. Staleness, not datelessness, is the signal worth surfacing.
The change lands in both the canonical workflow and the project mirror.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
