diff options
| author | Craig Jennings <c@cjennings.net> | 2026-05-22 18:17:45 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Craig Jennings <c@cjennings.net> | 2026-05-22 18:17:45 -0500 |
| commit | 1e216dd170a46d99ef400ca6bf98f97b23c1db9b (patch) | |
| tree | 983b686af870cbf0a1d852a89fca07d7a02ffb52 /inbox | |
| parent | 0ecb59f48fd2bce6ba0f62cf532fd9b013a259cc (diff) | |
| download | rulesets-1e216dd170a46d99ef400ca6bf98f97b23c1db9b.tar.gz rulesets-1e216dd170a46d99ef400ca6bf98f97b23c1db9b.zip | |
docs(skills): keep review-code re-review approvals bare
Extended the posted-summary voice guidance: a re-review confirming requested changes is just "Approving" plus at most a bare positive. An approve summary must not carry a clause describing what the change does or why it works — that's the banned pattern, since the author already knows the rationale and restating it reads as padding.
Diffstat (limited to 'inbox')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions