diff options
| author | Craig Jennings <c@cjennings.net> | 2026-05-25 15:11:08 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Craig Jennings <c@cjennings.net> | 2026-05-25 15:11:08 -0500 |
| commit | a5b955f7c74ad5e27bb73c6d2143359cc66b2455 (patch) | |
| tree | 9bb2bced6576e53ded3a615aee5404ef55f7a610 /languages | |
| parent | d27d07e8e4b004926ea960c118fa99caa979caa0 (diff) | |
| download | rulesets-a5b955f7c74ad5e27bb73c6d2143359cc66b2455.tar.gz rulesets-a5b955f7c74ad5e27bb73c6d2143359cc66b2455.zip | |
docs(skills): add voice pattern 40, praise/correction asymmetry
Voice gains pattern #40: strip the "why" from praise on an approve, since the author already knows why their change is good and the justification reads as flattery. Always keep the why on a finding or change-request, delivered gently. Behavior only changes when the reason lands.
review-code now runs a praise/correction gate before posting any summary, and its inline-comment guidance is tightened so the why-it-matters survives the brevity cuts. The reviewer states the stakes (a user hits a 500, a screen reader announces nothing), not just the mechanism.
Diffstat (limited to 'languages')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions