docs(design): draft wrap-up routing spec

A spec for the optional wrap-up step that routes inbox items (and, vNext, transcripts) to the project they belong to. Three decisions settled from grounding (reuse todo-cleanup's Open Work matcher as the destination anchor, move atomically through one helper, keep cross-project writes visible with a provenance note); three left open for Craig (separate router step vs merged into the inbox sanity check, transcript scope and trigger, reconciling with the defer-and-stage router). Five implementation phases, acceptance criteria, readiness dimensions.

Status stays draft while decisions are open. The todo task moves to DOING and links the spec.

From the archsetup handoff 2026-06-13.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/todo.org b/todo.org
index 6d94160..7ff30de 100644
--- a/todo.org
+++ b/todo.org
@@ -34,22 +34,14 @@ Tags are assigned and refreshed by =task-audit=; =task-review= keeps them honest
 
 * Rulesets Open Work
 
-** TODO [#B] Wrap-up inbox/transcript routing to destination projects :feature:spec:
+** DOING [#B] Wrap-up inbox/transcript routing to destination projects :feature:spec:
 :PROPERTIES:
 :CREATED: [2026-06-13 Sat]
 :LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-06-13
 :END:
-Add a routing step to =wrap-it-up.org=: when outstanding inbox items remain, surface them, recommend a destination project for each, and offer a batch-level "go with recommendations / skip" (not per-item, not a wrap gate). Task/event items move into the destination's =todo.org= "Open Work" section per =todo-format.md=; a parallel step files meeting transcripts into =assets/= per =working-files.md=.
+Optional wrap-up step that surfaces inbox items belonging to another project, recommends a destination, and batch-moves them into that project's =todo.org= Open Work section (transcript filing deferred to vNext). Spec drafted, decisions D1/D4/D5 awaiting Craig before implementation-ready.
 
-Spec-bound, not implement-now — clears the spec-create Phase 0 bar (>6h, real design uncertainty, cross-cutting, hard to reverse). Run =spec-create= first. Design questions the spec must settle:
-- Reconcile with this session's defer-and-stage router in =process-inbox.org= (the Skeptical Review's VERIFY path) — two "move inbox items to todo.org" mechanisms shouldn't compete.
-- Merge into the existing wrap-up "Inbox sanity check" step or stay a separate optional router (archsetup leans separate: one gates, one is optional).
-- Transcript half has an unresolved dependency (where recordings accumulate) and an open question (extract action items into todo.org, or file the artifact only and let the task-router handle items). Consider splitting transcript work to vNext.
-- Recommendation engine: infer destination from item content against discovered projects; low-confidence recs must flag themselves so the single keystroke stays trustworthy.
-- Widen project discovery from "=.ai/protocols.org= present" to "has =todo.org= with an Open Work heading" (reuse =todo-cleanup.el='s =--archive-done= matcher); a plain code repo with a =todo.org= is a valid destination.
-- Cross-project write discipline (=cross-project.md=): the batch "go" authorizes the write into another project's scope, but the move stays visible and leaves a provenance note. Likely needs an atomic cross-project move helper (extend =todo-cleanup.el= or a new =.ai/scripts= tool).
-
-Source: archsetup handoff 2026-06-13 (=inbox/2026-06-13-0021-from-archsetup-wrapup-inbox-routing-request.org=, moved to =docs/design/= on filing). No archsetup-side work; entirely a rulesets workflow change.
+Spec: [[file:docs/design/wrapup-routing-spec.org]]. Source proposal: [[file:docs/design/2026-06-13-wrapup-inbox-transcript-routing-proposal.org]] (archsetup handoff 2026-06-13). Next: =spec-review= once the open decisions resolve.
 
 ** TODO [#B] Helper-instance support — concurrent same-project Claude :feature:spec:
 :PROPERTIES: