diff options
Diffstat (limited to '.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org')
| -rw-r--r-- | .ai/workflows/no-approvals.org | 12 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org b/.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org index 1efce82..6b5c7fa 100644 --- a/.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org +++ b/.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #+TITLE: No-Approvals Mode -#+AUTHOR: Craig Jennings & Claude +#+AUTHOR: Craig Jennings #+DATE: 2026-05-28 * Overview @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ Craig activates the mode with any of: - Queuing several tasks in =todo.org= followed by any phrase above - Any equivalent phrasing that signals he doesn't want to be re-asked between items +*Not this mode:* any phrase containing "speedrun" ("speedrun", "no approvals speedrun") routes to =work-the-backlog.org='s no-approvals speedrun preset — an autonomous batch over an explicit ordered task set, with a pre-flight Q&A, autonomous commits, always-push, and an end-of-set page. This mode is the general interaction-gate suspension for whatever work is already underway; the speedrun is the dedicated backlog-batch workflow. + Mode resets when: - Craig says approvals are back on @@ -33,7 +35,7 @@ Mode resets when: The interaction gates that step the workflow back to Craig for an "OK to proceed?" check: -- The commit-message gate in =commits.md= Step 2. Print the final commit message inline, then commit immediately. No "approve / request changes / open in editor" prompt. +- The commit-message gate in the =publish= skill, Step 2. Print the final commit message inline, then commit immediately. No "approve / request changes / open in editor" prompt. - The PR-description gate. Print the final body, then create the PR. - The PR-review-reply gate. Print the final reply, then post. - "Ready to start?" / "Plan looks like X, proceed?" gates before implementation work begins. @@ -44,10 +46,10 @@ The interaction gates that step the workflow back to Craig for an "OK to proceed The engineering-discipline gates protect quality, not Craig's interaction time. They remain in force: -- =/review-code= against the staged diff before every commit. Critical and Important findings still block. Minor findings still surface. No "proceed anyway" override unless Craig has given it explicitly for this batch. +- =/review-code= against the staged diff before every commit, dispatched as an isolated adversarial reviewer per the =publish= skill's Step 1 — no-approvals removes *interaction* gates, never the isolation. Critical and Important findings still block, and the re-review loop still runs to approval. Minor findings still surface. No "proceed anyway" override unless Craig has given it explicitly for this batch. If the review can't reach approval — three rounds, a recurring finding, or a =Needs Discussion= verdict — that is a genuine question: park the item per step 4 and move to the next one rather than committing past a standing finding. - =/voice personal= on every publish artifact (commit messages, PR titles + bodies, PR review comments). The full pattern walk happens. The printed result just doesn't wait for approval. - The full test suite + lint + compile before commit (per =verification.md=). -- Fetch-and-reconcile in =commits.md= Step 0. +- Fetch-and-reconcile in the =publish= skill, Step 0. - Session Log updates per =protocols.org=. Every state-mutating turn writes to =.ai/session-context.org= before the closing message. The log is the crash-recovery anchor while Craig is away. Missing entries lose work. - Subagent review-gate cadence (=subagents.md=). Review each subagent's output before the next dispatch. - Destructive or irreversible operations per =CLAUDE.md='s "Executing actions with care": force-push, =rm -rf=, dropping a column, dropping a branch, package removal. These need explicit consent regardless of mode. No-approvals is for *interaction* gates, not destructive-action consent. @@ -68,7 +70,7 @@ For each item: - Do the work. - Update the Session Log per the rules in =protocols.org=. -- Before any commit: run =/review-code= against the staged diff. Surface Critical and Important findings inline; fix them and re-review until clean. Minor findings show but don't block. +- Before any commit: dispatch the isolated adversarial reviewer per the =publish= skill's Step 1 — never review your own staged diff inline. Surface Critical and Important findings; fix them and send the updated diff back to the *same* reviewer until it approves. Minor findings show but don't block and never earn another round. If the review can't reach approval — three rounds, a finding that recurs after being reported fixed, or a =Needs Discussion= verdict — park the item per step 4 with the standing findings and move on; don't commit past a blocking finding. - Draft the commit message. Run =/voice personal= (the skill, or walk the patterns inline if unavailable). Print the final message inline before committing so the log shows it. - Commit and push. - One-line status between items ("Task X done, on to Y.") so Craig knows what's happening when he checks back in. |