diff options
Diffstat (limited to '.ai')
| -rw-r--r-- | .ai/workflows/inbox.org | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | .ai/workflows/no-approvals.org | 4 |
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/.ai/workflows/inbox.org b/.ai/workflows/inbox.org index fc8091b..6faa20f 100644 --- a/.ai/workflows/inbox.org +++ b/.ai/workflows/inbox.org @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ When Craig has put the session in no-approvals mode, an accepted item may be imp 2. *Quick* — the whole implementation, including verification, is under ~15 minutes. 3. *Solo* — you can carry it end to end without a decision from Craig. Manual verification you perform yourself is fine; needing Craig to choose an option, approve a design, or resolve an ambiguity is not. -All three → implement it, verify, then commit and push at the end of that item (the Step 0 reconcile and pre-push check from =commits.md= still run). Miss any one and it doesn't self-apply: a shared-asset or convention change needs Craig's decision, so it fails *solo* and routes to the defer-and-stage park (core §2 / core §3); an oversized item fails *quick* and gets filed. +All three → implement it, verify, then commit and push at the end of that item (the Step 0 reconcile and pre-push check from the =publish= skill still run). Miss any one and it doesn't self-apply: a shared-asset or convention change needs Craig's decision, so it fails *solo* and routes to the defer-and-stage park (core §2 / core §3); an oversized item fails *quick* and gets filed. ** Replying to handoffs diff --git a/.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org b/.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org index 5f54b96..b4c7fcf 100644 --- a/.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org +++ b/.ai/workflows/no-approvals.org @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Mode resets when: The interaction gates that step the workflow back to Craig for an "OK to proceed?" check: -- The commit-message gate in =commits.md= Step 2. Print the final commit message inline, then commit immediately. No "approve / request changes / open in editor" prompt. +- The commit-message gate in the =publish= skill, Step 2. Print the final commit message inline, then commit immediately. No "approve / request changes / open in editor" prompt. - The PR-description gate. Print the final body, then create the PR. - The PR-review-reply gate. Print the final reply, then post. - "Ready to start?" / "Plan looks like X, proceed?" gates before implementation work begins. @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The engineering-discipline gates protect quality, not Craig's interaction time. - =/review-code= against the staged diff before every commit. Critical and Important findings still block. Minor findings still surface. No "proceed anyway" override unless Craig has given it explicitly for this batch. - =/voice personal= on every publish artifact (commit messages, PR titles + bodies, PR review comments). The full pattern walk happens. The printed result just doesn't wait for approval. - The full test suite + lint + compile before commit (per =verification.md=). -- Fetch-and-reconcile in =commits.md= Step 0. +- Fetch-and-reconcile in the =publish= skill, Step 0. - Session Log updates per =protocols.org=. Every state-mutating turn writes to =.ai/session-context.org= before the closing message. The log is the crash-recovery anchor while Craig is away. Missing entries lose work. - Subagent review-gate cadence (=subagents.md=). Review each subagent's output before the next dispatch. - Destructive or irreversible operations per =CLAUDE.md='s "Executing actions with care": force-push, =rm -rf=, dropping a column, dropping a branch, package removal. These need explicit consent regardless of mode. No-approvals is for *interaction* gates, not destructive-action consent. |