diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'claude-templates')
| -rw-r--r-- | claude-templates/.ai/workflows/work-the-backlog.org | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/claude-templates/.ai/workflows/work-the-backlog.org b/claude-templates/.ai/workflows/work-the-backlog.org index 090841d..ab24d3b 100644 --- a/claude-templates/.ai/workflows/work-the-backlog.org +++ b/claude-templates/.ai/workflows/work-the-backlog.org @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Task *size* is deliberately absent from this gate. A large but well-specified, d After the scope read, run each eligible candidate through the checklist. Each item is a concrete, answerable question, not an adjective. *Any* hit — or any "unsure" — defers the task. Only a task that clears every item is implemented. -1. *Test-writability (the keystone).* Can I write the failing test from the task text — plus any decisions gathered up front — without inventing a requirement? *No / unsure* → underspecified. Under the speedrun preset, if the gap is one or two quick answerable questions, route it to the pre-flight Q&A; otherwise file a =VERIFY= noting what's missing. Under the unattended loop, file the =VERIFY= (no one to ask). +1. *Test-writability (the keystone).* Can I write the failing test from the task text — plus any decisions gathered up front — without inventing a requirement? *No / unsure* → underspecified. Under the speedrun preset, if the gap is one or two quick answerable questions, route it to the pre-flight Q&A; otherwise file a =VERIFY= noting what's missing. Under the unattended loop, file the =VERIFY= (no one to ask). *Open-ended goals are a specific, recognizable failure of this item:* a task phrased as an absence ("find bugs until none remain," "refactor until nothing worthwhile is left," "clean it up") has no writable acceptance test and so isn't really =:solo:=, even when tagged. Don't guess a stopping point — defer it and note that it needs measurable acceptance criteria (bound the surface, characterization net, dispositioned findings, objective floor — see =todo-format.md='s "Making an open-ended task measurable"). Once those are in the task body, it becomes runnable. 2. *Data-loss / irreversible / external operation.* Does implementing it require any of: =rm= of non-scratch data, =git reset --hard= / force-push, =DROP= / =DELETE= / =TRUNCATE=, file truncate/overwrite of persisted content, a schema or data migration, any external or shared-state mutation, any credential touch? *Yes* → do NOT implement; file a =VERIFY= naming the risk. This is the hard safety gate; an upfront answer never overrides it without an explicit checkpoint. 3. *Already-satisfied.* Does the scope read show the desired end-state already holds? *Yes* → file a =VERIFY= noting it and move on. Don't make a no-op change. 4. *Design deliberation.* Does the task carry an unresolved design question, a "weigh these approaches" with real tradeoffs, or a TBD that isn't a quick factual answer? *Yes* → under the speedrun preset, if it collapses to one or two quick questions, route to the pre-flight Q&A; otherwise file and surface as a =/start-work= candidate. Under the loop, file. The discriminator is *quick-answerable question* vs *deliberation* — never task size. |
