1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/docs/design/2026-06-27-bug-priority-matrix-cover-note.org b/docs/design/2026-06-27-bug-priority-matrix-cover-note.org
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d6398e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/design/2026-06-27-bug-priority-matrix-cover-note.org
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+#+TITLE: Cover note for the bug-priority-matrix-proposal.md just sent
+#+SOURCE: from emacs-wttrin
+#+DATE: 2026-06-27 23:57:30 -0400
+
+Cover note for the bug-priority-matrix-proposal.md just sent. WHAT: a Severity × Frequency bug-priority matrix (P1-P4) distilled from wttrin's priority scheme today. It derives a bug's priority from two facts (severity, frequency) instead of opinion, maps each cell to a release vehicle, and — for projects running the todo-format [#A]-[#D] scheme — has bugs derive their letter from the matrix while features keep their roadmap judgment. Includes a special-category rule (privacy/security/safety graded on severity alone) and a tie-in that makes a 'no open [#A]' release gate fact-based. WHY SEND: this is a generic defect-management pattern, not wttrin-specific, so it belongs upstream to distribute with any code-centric project (a claude-rule and/or a todo.org priority-scheme template snippet — your call on placement and whether it folds into todo-format.md or stands alone). TWO ASKS: (1) consider a companion NON-CODING matrix for work-product/ops/decision defects — the same frequency×severity shape likely generalizes beyond bugs; (2) treat this as a LIVING DOCUMENT — adjust bands and wording as projects use it until it's as mature as the coding matrix. SOURCING: the matrix is a standard industry pattern; I adapted a generic version and the wttrin worked-example. Nothing work-confidential is copied — please keep the upstream artifact generic and uncited to any private reference. wttrin keeps its local copy in todo.org as the stopgap until you distribute the canonical.