diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'todo.org')
| -rw-r--r-- | todo.org | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ Tags are assigned and refreshed by =task-audit=; =task-review= keeps them honest ** TODO [#C] task-review pass at end of task-audit :chore:solo: Have the =task-audit= workflow chain a =task-review= pass as its final phase, so a freshly-audited list also gets the lighter staleness/honesty sweep without a second invocation. The legend already notes the division of labor — task-audit assigns and refreshes tags, task-review keeps them honest in passing — so running task-review at the tail of task-audit closes the loop in one pass. Edit =claude-templates/.ai/workflows/task-audit.org= (and the synced mirror) to add the final phase; check whether =open-tasks.org= already invokes task-review so the chaining stays consistent. +** TODO [#C] lint-followups drift — reconcile-on-write + audit dead-link reaping :feature: +From an .emacs.d handoff (2026-06-02): running task-audit against a large todo.org proved several =.ai/lint-followups.org= entries stale (four dead-link flags pointed at docs that now exist; three near-duplicate dated lint runs had piled up). Two fixes, scoped separately. + +1. =lint-org= workflow/script (the real fix): reconcile-on-write. Before appending a run, drop entries whose finding no longer reproduces (dead link now resolves, flagged block/timestamp now clean) and dedupe against the prior run instead of re-logging. Key entries by content/finding rather than line number, so they survive edits to the target file (line numbers go stale immediately). +2. =task-audit.org= (small, narrow): in the Phase C link-hygiene step, when fixing/verifying a =file:= link, also reap any matching dead-link entry in the project's lint-followups file so the two artifacts don't drift. Scope explicitly to dead-link entries — do NOT pull general lint cleanup into the audit; that mixes two concerns and slows the audit. + +** TODO [#C] start-work Justify gate: explicit "reasons not to do this" item :feature: +From a work handoff (2026-06-02, surfaced running /start-work on a clean low-risk refactor). The Phase 2 Justify gate has "Downsides" and "Alternatives considered" but no forced devil's-advocate verdict on "should we even do this?" Add a "top reasons not to do this" item: surface the top three objections if any exist; when none rise to a real objection, state one line instead of manufacturing three (e.g. "Nothing material argues against this; no reason to defer or drop it"). Building the case against the work before committing is cheapest exactly at this gate, which is its purpose. Edit the start-work skill's Justify-gate phase. + ** TODO [#B] Cross-project pattern catalog :spec:thinking: :PROPERTIES: :LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-05-28 |