diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'todo.org')
| -rw-r--r-- | todo.org | 50 |
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -39,6 +39,56 @@ Tags are assigned and refreshed by =task-audit=; =task-review= keeps them honest * Rulesets Open Work +** TODO [#C] sentry.org calls one loop cycle a "fire" :chore:solo: +:PROPERTIES: +:LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-07-28 +:END: +Craig read home's "nine fires" as nine emergencies and went looking for what was burning (2026-07-28): "I assume you mean nine crises, not nine loop cycles and I begin to get scared." The term reaches him directly — digest headings render as =** Fire 11 — 08:32 CDT= in the anchor he reads every morning. 35 instances in =sentry.org=. + +Grading: Minor severity (a user-facing artifact that miscommunicates, no data loss) x most users frequently (every digest, on every project running sentry) = P3 = [#C]. + +*Take the problem, not home's proposed term.* home proposed "pass", reasoning that it already lives in the file's vocabulary. That is exactly what disqualifies it. =sentry.org= already uses "pass" as a precise numbered noun: "the pass list", "the Pass Runner", "eleven finding/hygiene passes", "pass 12" for the implementation pass. There are exactly eleven hygiene passes, so home's proposed digest heading =** Pass 11= collides with an existing real referent. Renaming would trade a term Craig misreads as urgent for one that is genuinely ambiguous. + +Counter-proposal: *cycle*. It appears zero times in =sentry.org=, so there is nothing to collide with. It is also Craig's own word from the very quote that surfaced this ("not nine loop cycles"). =** Cycle 11 — 08:32 CDT= reads cleanly. Checked and rejected: "sweep" (already used for hygiene and property sweeps) and "run" (already used as a noun, "first live run"). + +Keep the verb sense of fire throughout ("the notify fires", "the path never fires") — only the noun meaning one loop cycle changes. Past session anchors are historical records and stay as written. + +Craig approved "cycle" on 2026-07-28. That settles the only judgment the task carried, so it is =:solo:= now: the surface is the 35 noun-sense instances in =sentry.org=, and the completion check is objective — zero noun-sense "fire" left, verb sense untouched, lint clean, suite green, canonical and mirror in sync. + +Source: home handoff, 2026-07-28. + +** TODO [#B] references/ is linked from protocols.org but never synced :bug: +:PROPERTIES: +:LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-07-28 +:END: +=protocols.org:273= links to =references/calendar-reference.org=, but startup.org's rsync copies only =protocols.org=, =workflows/=, and =scripts/=. So the link is dead in every consuming project. Confirmed: the file exists at =claude-templates/.ai/references/=, and neither home nor =.emacs.d= has a =.ai/references/= at all. + +Grading: Minor severity (a documented reference an agent can't follow, workaround is to search or ask) x every user every time (every consuming project, every sync) = P2 = [#B]. + +Two ways out: add =references/= to the rsync set, or drop the link and keep the file rulesets-only. My read is add it to the sync, because the link exists precisely so a session in another project can reach the calendar recipes. + +The =--delete= hazard I expected is not there. work is the only project with a =.ai/references/=, and its copy is byte-identical to the source (=diff -rq= clean), so nothing project-owned would be destroyed. Any *new* project-owned file under =references/= would be, which is the same tradeoff =workflows/= and =scripts/= already carry. + +Not =:solo:= — it changes a synced template, which needs Craig's approval by the inbox rule, and the sync-vs-drop choice is his. + +Source: winvm link-integrity pass, 2026-07-28. + +** TODO [#C] Two lint defects at the template source :chore: +:PROPERTIES: +:LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-07-28 +:END: +Both verified at the rulesets source, so every project seeded from them inherits the defect. + +=retrospectives/PRINCIPLES.org:38= violates the org-table standard (no closing rule). =lint-org= flags it as =org-table-standard=, and =wrap-org-table.el= reflows it mechanically. This half is purely tool-driven. + +=protocols.org= lints at 8 mechanical + 19 judgment =misplaced-heading= hits, all from Markdown =**bold**= in an org file, which org reads as a level-2 heading when it starts a line. 48 bold spans total, 14 of them line-initial. This half is not mechanical: converting to org =*bold*= is 48 edits, and =lint-org --fix= would rewrite the line-initial ones without knowing they are emphasis rather than headings. + +Grading: Cosmetic severity x every user every time = P3 = [#C]. It is most of the linter's noise on protocols.org, which is the real cost — noise that trains the reader to skip the report. + +Not =:solo:= — both files are synced templates. + +Source: winvm link-integrity pass, 2026-07-28. + ** DOING [#B] Finish context-engineering rightsizing :refactor: :PROPERTIES: :LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-07-27 |