diff options
| author | Craig Jennings <c@cjennings.net> | 2026-05-28 01:55:16 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Craig Jennings <c@cjennings.net> | 2026-05-28 01:55:16 -0500 |
| commit | e83e323148e1c4295233a25b1375f661cc65fbef (patch) | |
| tree | 60cc47401a289404b780967e3d009cabb1cf4b93 | |
| parent | 80775e70e7c827b27e72a1ca1910df4250929131 (diff) | |
| download | rulesets-e83e323148e1c4295233a25b1375f661cc65fbef.tar.gz rulesets-e83e323148e1c4295233a25b1375f661cc65fbef.zip | |
docs(todo): clarify what blocks the iteration-history backfill TODO
The earlier body listed two reasons to wait: a file-conflict block (correct, since spec-review.org and spec-response.org have uncommitted edits) and a guess that the entry-shape spec might still change (inference without evidence). The revised dependency drops the guess. The read-only research portion can run in parallel without touching the files.
| -rw-r--r-- | todo.org | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ Files to update: Investigation: search =.ai/sessions/=, =.ai/notes.org=, inbox archive, and git log for mentions of these workflow docs. Identify review/response/design iterations, dates, and contributors (including agents where known: Claude Code, Codex, local models). Distinguish high-confidence history (commits, dated session entries) from inferred (chat-only context). Recommend whether enough evidence exists to populate the section, and draft the entries if so. -Dependency: do not start until the spec-review/spec-response WIP is committed. The requirement itself is still being finalized. +Dependency: spec-review.org and spec-response.org have uncommitted edits in flight. Wait for those to land before writing to the files. The read-only research portion (search sessions, identify iterations, draft entries to a scratch file) can run in parallel without conflict. :PROPERTIES: :LAST_REVIEWED: 2026-05-28 |